Re: Remove behaviour of postmaster -o - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Remove behaviour of postmaster -o
Date
Msg-id 4127.1147144818@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove behaviour of postmaster -o  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not sure why Peter didn't continue working on it.

> I'm still working on the postmaster/postgres merge.  But the behavior of 
> postmaster -o is not going to be removed.  That TODO item might be 
> appropriate in a release or three at best.

I think the point though is that -o becomes a no-op: whether you put -o
in front of some options won't matter anymore, because they'll be
interpreted the same either way.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Albert Cervera Areny
Date:
Subject: Inheritance, Primary Keys and Foreign Keys
Next
From: PFC
Date:
Subject: Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal