Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Hallgren
Subject Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)
Date
Msg-id 4472B889.5090308@tada.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> I think the hard part of this task is designing the API for access to
> the rowsets from triggers.
> 
My preference would be something similar to two Portal instances (the NEW and OLD). I could 
then map it in the same way that I map the result of a query. If the API actually used two 
real Portal instances, the PL/Java implementation would take minutes.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: API changes in patch release
Next
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition