Re: WITH/WITH RECURSIVE implementation discussion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject Re: WITH/WITH RECURSIVE implementation discussion
Date
Msg-id 200605020851.k428pbd23052@webbased16.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WITH/WITH RECURSIVE implementation discussion  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: WITH/WITH RECURSIVE implementation discussion
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonah H. Harris [mailto:jonah.harris@gmail.com]
> Sent: 01 May 2006 14:56
> To: Mark Cave-Ayland
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WITH/WITH RECURSIVE implementation discussion
> 
> On 5/1/06, Mark Cave-Ayland <m.cave-ayland@webbased.co.uk> wrote:
> > The latest discussion I found related to this appears to be here:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00564.php which
> > indicates that Jonah is hoping to work on this for 8.2, but I don't see
> this
> > item as being worked on in the TODO list - does that mean that
> development
> > on this has halted?
> 
> No, in between all my other work here at EnterpriseDB, I'm still
> working on it.  I hope to get it submitted to -patches for review in
> the next two weeks.


Hi Jonah,

That's great news. While I wouldn't say that I have intimate knowledge of
the PostgreSQL internals, I'd be happy to try and help you with this if time
is proving to be a problem.


Kind regards,

Mark.

------------------------
WebBased Ltd
17 Research Way
Plymouth
PL6 8BT

T: +44 (0)1752 797131
F: +44 (0)1752 791023

http://www.webbased.co.uk   
http://www.infomapper.com
http://www.swtc.co.uk  

This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient
and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or
use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other
person.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Nikolay Samokhvalov"
Date:
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table