Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq
Date
Msg-id 10626.1146761259@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Semi-undocumented functions in libpq  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> Comparing the lists of functions exported by libpq and those declared
> by libpq-fe.h turns up a fair number of descrepancies. Most of these
> functions are declared by internal header files. For clarity I think we
> should clarify the situation, either explicity declare them for
> external users, or stop exporting them. Now that we've bumped the major
> version of libpq, now is the perfect time to decide.

Already done no?  (at least on the platforms where we know how to
restrict it)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions