Re: SQL compliant interval implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: SQL compliant interval implementation
Date
Msg-id 200605231516.32201.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to SQL compliant interval implementation  ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SQL compliant interval implementation  ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Brendan,

> There are two classes of intervals. One class, called year-month
> intervals, has an express or implied datetime precision that includes
> no fields other than YEAR and MONTH, though not both are required. The
> other class, called day-time intervals, has an express or implied
> interval precision that can include any fields other than YEAR or
> MONTH.

Yeah, we used to do that.  It sucked.  In fact, most developers of 
applications which were calendar-heavy ended up using custom data types to 
work around the SQL-spec INTERVAL limitations.  And that benefits nobody.

We modified our INTERVAL type to function in ways that calendar application 
developers (of which there are several on this list) can actually use.  
See discussion leading up to the 8.0 release.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL compliant interval implementation
Next
From: "Brendan Jurd"
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL compliant interval implementation