Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Wong
Subject Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table
Date
Msg-id 44621AF1.9000606@osdl.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Could you turn full_page_writes = off and do a few more tests? I think
> the full page writes is swamping the xlog and masking the performance we
> might see for normal small xlog writes.
> I'd try XLOG_BLCKSZ = 4096 and 8192 to start with. Thanks.

Ok, got data for XLOG_BLCKXZ at 4096, 8192, and 32768 with
full_page_wirtes = off.  The new data is at the bottom of the
page:http://developer.osdl.org/markw/pgsql/xlog_blcksz.html

Mark


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gurjeet Singh"
Date:
Subject: Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error
Next
From: Mike Benoit
Date:
Subject: Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error