Re: anoncvs still slow - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: anoncvs still slow
Date
Msg-id 20060529141211.E1114@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: anoncvs still slow  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Responses Re: anoncvs still slow
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> AFAICS, this is caused by the machine attempting to relay thousands and 
> thousands of spam emails (some quick checked showed a rate of about 1 
> spam / 5 seconds enytering the queue - and I know I deleted almost 
> 20,000 from the queue)

And how exactly would you like me to fix *that*?  The reason those were in 
the queue is because svr4 is a legit MX record for the mailing lists ... 
the messages are being delivered into svr4's mail queue, and 
mail.postgresql.org subsequently refusing htem because they are for 
invalid addresses ...

If I remove svr4 as an MX record, its just going to move to a different 
machine ...

So, how exactly would you like me to "fix" that problem?

> For bittorrent, I propose we take it out. We've suggested it before, I
> don't recall receiving any real requests to keep it, and IMHO it's way
> much more pain than it's worth. Therefor, unless someone objects, I'll
> pull the bittorrent links from the website in a couple of days, and then
> we can just remove it from the server.

That works for me ... let me know once its is down, and then I can easily 
do the upgrade ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for debugging of server-side stored procedures
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: anoncvs still slow