Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren wrote:>
>> Couldn't we just install something that replaced invalid dates with a
>> randomly generated but otherwise correct dates? That way they would
>> become completely invisible. No one could even tell that the date was
>> invalid to start with.
>
> No we can't, because then we are taking an invalid date, which is
> potentially valid data (to the user) and modifying it to a valid date
> that is indeed invalid data.
I think you should have read a `;-)' after Thomas' suggestion.
;-)
Best Regards,
Michael
