Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date
Msg-id 446DE02E.7030101@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
List pgsql-hackers
When MySQL is at that
> point, which database do you think executives will be choosing? The one
> with a very large userbase and lots of marketing and PR that they've
> heard plenty about,

All due respect, Jim -- but don't you work for a publicly traded 
database company that happens to have its own version of PostgreSQL?

This is really a discussion for your marketing (and mine frankly) then 
the PostgreSQL mailing lists :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake




-- 
   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997             http://www.commandprompt.com/
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Next
From: "Mark Woodward"
Date:
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?