Re: Why is CVS server so slow? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Why is CVS server so slow?
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F9BB@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why is CVS server so slow?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> >> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:30:36PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>> I'm logged on daily interactively, and haven't noticed
> any issues ...
> >
> >> Are you both referring to the same server?  I've noticed that
> >> anoncvs.postgresql.org (66.98.251.159) has been slow for a
> couple of
> >> days -- it just took over five minutes to do a cvs update of HEAD
> >> where it usually takes thirty seconds or less.
> >
> > Yeah, I was about to say the same.  The master CVS server
> has been OK
> > (not great, but OK) for the last week or so; but I believe
> the folks
> > complaining are using anoncvs.
>
> Anyone noticing any network issues?  I just looked over the
> server itself, swapping a *little* bit, but vmstat shows the
> disks aren't busy ... and nothing unusual taking up CPU on
> the server itself ...

anoncvs is on svr4, right? It's been dead slow due to spam getting
trapped in a loop because of configuration errors (see other mails with
details on what we need to do to fix that).

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is CVS server so slow?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention