Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2006-05-19 kell 22:53, kirjutas Martijn van
Oosterhout:
> libreadline is not a problem because you can distribute postgresql
> compiled with readline and comply with all licences involved
> simultaneously.
oh? my impression was that we are clear, because libreadline is just one
of "readline" implementations we support.
> It doesn't work with openssl because the licence
> requires things that are incompatable with the GPL.
Still clients can compile/use libpq without OpenSSL and be on safe
ground.
> The openssl faq suggest that you can take advantage of the exception,
> which reads:
>
> However, as a special exception, the source code distributed need not
> include anything that is normally distributed (in either source or
> binary form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on)
> of the operating system on which the executable runs, unless that
> component itself accompanies the executable.
>
> I don't buy that argument, and I'm not the only one. OpenSSL is an
> optional part of most Linuxes, so there's no way you can use that
> exception.
But on most linuxes optional parts ar also "normally distributed" :P
Even network drivers may be counted optional for pure linux (kernel)
experience, but are still normally distributed.
--
----------------
Hannu Krosing
Database Architect
Skype Technologies OÜ
Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia
Skype me: callto:hkrosing
Get Skype for free: http://www.skype.com
NOTICE: This communication contains privileged or other confidential
information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender
by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments
without copying or disclosing the contents.
