Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq
Date
Msg-id 2724.1146770516@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:47:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Already done no?  (at least on the platforms where we know how to
>> restrict it)

> These functions are all in the exports.txt. I was just wondering if we
> wanted to cut that list down any more...

AFAIK, everything that is in exports.txt was put there for a reason.
I'm happy with the situation as it stands (other than wanting to enforce
the exports.txt restriction on more platforms ...)

Did we come to a decision about whether to implement symbol versioning
for libpq?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions