Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)
Date
Msg-id 20060522191418.GA13518@surnet.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:41:59AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > CREATE TRIGGER name { BEFORE | AFTER } { event [ OR ... ] }
> > >     ON table FOR EACH STATEMENT
> > >     EXECUTE PROCEDURE funcname ( arguments )
> >  
> > And that doesn't give you any information on the rows that were
> > modified. Other RDBMSes will provide a NEW rowset and an OLD rowset that
> > you can select from inside the trigger as if they were real tables.
> 
> Is this on the TODO list? It doesn't seem too difficult to create a
> tuplestore and store the NEW and OLD tuples there and pass the whole
> set to the trigger.

OTOH it would be nice to be able to save only the TIDs of the tuples,
not the tuples themselves ... maybe create a "TIDstore"?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?