Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
>> This argument strikes me as nonsense. You've got a utility that's smart
>> enough to parse the very-free-format message bodies, but it's going to
>> be too confused by the log line prefix?
>
> Having tinkered a little with PQA, yes, actually. The issue is that the
> "message" text can easily be multi-line and contain a vast variety of
> special characters. The issue is figuring out where the prefix, the tag
> and the message begin and end. And our text log format makes that a PITA.
>
Hmmm... well why don't we add log_line_suffix :)
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency:
+1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/