Re: anoncvs still slow - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: anoncvs still slow
Date
Msg-id 20060529182104.GA17715@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: anoncvs still slow  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 03:00:44PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> >Run something like:
> >mailq | grep "Recipient address rejected"
> 
> I thought that the above was supposed to be a perm error, not temp?  Does 
> anyone know what I need to set in postfix on svr1 to change it to a perm?

Do you have soft bounce turned on?  A mailbox unavailable message
should be a 550 error.  Or is the problem that the relay gets back
the rejection, and then queues a message to the originating mailer
(which was, of course, a drone, and therefore won't be available)? 
The latter case will _also_ eat up a ton of resources. 
Unfortunately, there's no standards-compliant way to drop such
connections on the floor instead of erroring, once you've accepted
the mail.

Better to reject at the time of connection, which is what the
local_recipient_maps setting is for.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.                --Brad Holland


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: anoncvs still slow
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: anoncvs still slow