Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:25:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> mark@mark.mielke.cc writes:
>>> Ah. I was wondering about that. When I saw the first poster tag
>>> 'SECURITY DEFINER' on the end of the expression I assumed it was
>>> something that I didn't know you could do... :-)
>> No, he was inventing syntax that doesn't exist.
>
> Which begs the question, how hard would it be to add that syntax? I
> suspect it would be useful in cases besides sequences, and certainly
> seems to be a lot less of a hassle than having to wrap stuff in an extra
> function just to get that capability...
In all the internal purity and technical concerns it helps PostGreSQL to
have an easy migration path for MySQL refugees. Anyways I think its
quite clear that there is more need for a black box than a macro.
regards,
Lukas
