Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date
Msg-id 20060520153426.GW64371@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  (Lukas Smith <smith@pooteeweet.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:36:25AM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I really think that PostgreSQL could benefit from a packaged solution 
> that incorporates a lot of the contrib stuff (tsearch2, maybe even some 
> replication setups ..). I really like the approach that PostgreSQL is a 
> clean yet highly extensible base from which other people can build their 
> specific tools.

I think we're starting to see some of that, with things like the live
CD.

What I'd rather see time spent on is a framework that makes it easier to
grab things from pgFoundry. To use a bad example, think CPAN for
PostgreSQL.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?