Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 April 2006

• 00:09   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 00:11   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 00:27   listen not schema-aware Agent M
• 00:31   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Fetter
• 00:35   Re: First Aggregate Funtion? Mike Rylander
• 00:41   Re: listen not schema-aware Neil Conway
• 00:52   Re: listen not schema-aware Tom Lane
• 03:02   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Tom Lane
• 09:03   Remote PL/Java, Summary Thomas Hallgren
• 11:34   Re: [GENERAL] PANIC: heap_update_redo: no block Qingqing Zhou
• 12:13   Re: Remote PL/Java, Summary Andrew Dunstan
• 12:24   Re: Remote PL/Java, Summary Andrew Dunstan
• 12:47   Postgres dies when using an intarray operator jeroen van iddekinge
• 13:58   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:15   Re: pg_class catalog question... Jim C. Nasby
• 14:21   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Jim C. Nasby
• 14:35   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:42   Re: pg_class catalog question... Thomas Hallgren
• 14:43   Re: Remote PL/Java, Summary Thomas Hallgren
• 14:47   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Andrew Dunstan
• 15:44   Re: Postgres dies when using an intarray operator Michael Fuhr
• 16:26   Re: control pg_hba.conf via SQL Agent M
• 17:01   Re: control pg_hba.conf via SQL Andrew Dunstan
• 17:14   Re: control pg_hba.conf via SQL Agent M
• 17:43   libpq Describe Extension [WAS: Bytea and perl] Volkan YAZICI
• 18:14   Re: Slony-I for circular replication Gustavo Tonini
• 20:10   Re: Postgres dies when using an intarray operator Michael Fuhr
• 22:37   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 22:39   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 22:44   Problem compiling with mingw Juan Manuel Diaz Lara
• 22:45   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 22:49   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Peter Eisentraut
• 22:51   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 23:58   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Tom Lane

2 April 2006

• 00:20   Re: Postgres dies when using an intarray operator Tom Lane
• 01:38   Re: Slony-I for circular replication Christopher Browne
• 09:17   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Correct some errors and do some SGML Alvaro Herrera
• 14:21   Re: Problem compiling with mingw Qingqing Zhou
• 16:40   uh-oh, buildfarm all red Tom Lane
• 18:50   Re: pg_class catalog question... Jim C. Nasby
• 18:53   Re: pg_class catalog question... Thomas Hallgren
• 19:18   Re: pg_class catalog question... Tom Lane
• 19:38   Re: pg_class catalog question... Jonah H. Harris
• 19:45   Re: pg_class catalog question... Tom Lane
• 19:52   semaphore usage "port based"? Marc G. Fournier
• 20:01   Re: Slony-I for circular replication Gustavo Tonini
• 20:11   Re: psql \c error Neil Conway
• 20:58   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Marc G. Fournier
• 21:13   Re: pg_class catalog question... Jonah H. Harris
• 22:13   Re: pg_class catalog question... Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Tom Lane
• 22:36   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Tom Lane
• 22:42   Re: pg_class catalog question... Jonah H. Harris
• 23:53   WAL Bypass for indexes Martin Scholes

3 April 2006

• 00:17   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Tom Lane
• 00:22   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Jonah H. Harris
• 00:35   Re: uh-oh, buildfarm all red Andrew Dunstan
• 00:42   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Tom Lane
• 00:47   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Robert Treat
• 00:52   Re: uh-oh, buildfarm all red Tom Lane
• 00:56   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Marc G. Fournier
• 01:00   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Jonah H. Harris
• 01:06   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Tom Lane
• 01:20   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Tom Lane
• 01:22   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 01:31   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Marc G. Fournier
• 01:32   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Tom Lane
• 01:35   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Tom Lane
• 01:37   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:53   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Marc G. Fournier
• 02:41   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Martin Scholes
• 03:08   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Tom Lane
• 03:17   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Tom Lane
• 03:27   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Tom Lane
• 03:31   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Marc G. Fournier
• 03:38   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Marc G. Fournier
• 03:52   Back, heading to Boston Bruce Momjian
• 04:24   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Marc G. Fournier
• 04:53   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Jonah H. Harris
• 05:48   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Tom Lane
• 11:29   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Simon Riggs
• 11:31   Re: Postgres dies when using an intarray operator Teodor Sigaev
• 12:19   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Martin Scholes
• 13:49   deferrable check, trigger Horváth Sándor
• 13:55   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Tom Lane
• 14:29   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Simon Riggs
• 15:31   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Hannu Krosing
• 15:38   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Hannu Krosing
• 15:41   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Tom Lane
• 16:37   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Tom Lane
• 17:07   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Tom Lane
• 18:17   Feature list for SQL:2003 Peter Eisentraut
• 18:22   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Vivek Khera
• 19:41   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Stephen Frost
• 19:45   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 19:49   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Stephen Frost
• 19:57   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Tom Lane
• 20:08   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:32   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 20:37   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Alvaro Herrera
• 20:44   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:45   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 20:49   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 21:28   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 21:37   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Tom Lane
• 21:44   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Peter Eisentraut
• 22:50   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Stephen Frost
• 23:07   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Mark Dilger
• 23:46   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Marc G. Fournier
• 23:56   Re: pg_class catalog question... Jim Nasby

4 April 2006

• 01:17   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Stephen Frost
• 01:39   Re: Fixing domain input Tom Lane
• 05:21   Re: pg_class catalog question... Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:23   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Andrew Dunstan
• 19:10   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Kris Kennaway
• 19:10   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Kris Kennaway
• 19:10   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Kris Kennaway
• 19:10   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Andrew Thompson
• 19:10   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Kris Kennaway
• 19:13   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Robert Watson
• 19:13   will it work siva kumar
• 19:13   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Robert Watson
• 19:13   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Robert Watson
• 19:13   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Robert Watson
• 19:13   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Robert Watson
• 19:13   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Kris Kennaway
• 19:13   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Robert Watson
• 19:13   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Kris Kennaway
• 19:13   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Robert Watson
• 19:36   Re: will it work Jonah H. Harris

5 April 2006

• 00:06   I have changed employers Bruce Momjian
• 00:20   Re: I have changed employers Alvaro Herrera
• 00:22   Re: I have changed employers Luke Lonergan
• 00:56   Stats collection on Windows Peter Brant
• 02:20   Re: Fixing domain input Michael Glaesemann
• 02:25   Re: Fixing domain input Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:46   Re: Fixing domain input Tom Lane
• 02:51   Re: Fixing domain input Michael Glaesemann
• 03:02   Re: Stats collection on Windows Tom Lane
• 03:07   Re: Stats collection on Windows Qingqing Zhou
• 03:13   Re: Stats collection on Windows Qingqing Zhou
• 03:17   Re: Stats collection on Windows Tom Lane
• 03:29   Left joins and inheritance (table partitioning) Rod Taylor
• 03:50   Re: Left joins and inheritance (table partitioning) Tom Lane
• 04:12   Re: Left joins and inheritance (table partitioning) Rod Taylor
• 04:15   Summer of Code Preparation Josh Berkus
• 05:25   Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update Josh Berkus
• 06:31   Re: Stats collection on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 07:12   Re: Stats collection on Windows mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 07:20   Re: I have changed employers Devrim GUNDUZ
• 07:20   Re: Stats collection on Windows mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 07:30   Re: Stats collection on Windows Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:38   Re: Stats collection on Windows mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 07:59   Re: Stats collection on Windows Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:23   Re: Stats collection on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 08:31   Re: Stats collection on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 10:03   Re: Stats collection on Windows mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 10:06   Re: Stats collection on Windows mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 10:20   Re: Stats collection on Windows Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:35   Re: Stats collection on Windows mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 10:57   Re: Stats collection on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 10:58   Re: Stats collection on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 11:09   Re: Stats collection on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 11:22   commit callback, request Pavel Stehule
• 14:06   Re: Stats collection on Windows Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: Tru64/Alpha problems Andrew Dunstan
• 14:07   Re: Stats collection on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 14:13   Re: Stats collection on Windows stephen joseph butler
• 14:14   Re: commit callback, request Tom Lane
• 14:30   Re: Stats collection on Windows Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: Tru64/Alpha problems Tom Lane
• 14:42   Re: Stats collection on Windows stephen joseph butler
• 14:42   Re: Stats collection on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 14:44   Re: commit callback, request Pavel Stehule
• 14:45   Re: Stats collection on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 14:46   recover without $PGDATA/global patrick
• 14:48   Re: float8 regression test failure in head Patrick Welche
• 14:49   Re: Stats collection on Windows Tom Lane
• 14:54   Re: Stats collection on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 15:06   Re: Stats collection on Windows Tom Lane
• 15:23   Re: Summer of Code Preparation Jim Nasby
• 15:40   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Martin Scholes
• 16:09   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Tom Lane
• 16:46   Re: Stats collection on Windows mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 16:54   Re: Stats collection on Windows mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 16:55   Re: Stats collection on Windows Peter Brant
• 17:10   Control File Bruno Almeida do Lago
• 17:44   Re: Summer of Code Preparation Nathan Buchanan
• 18:00   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Simon Riggs
• 18:01   request: muting notice CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence Pavel Stehule
• 18:29   Re: commit callback, request, SOLVED Pavel Stehule
• 20:18   Re: First Aggregate Funtion? Bruno Wolff III
• 20:29   Speaking of pgstats Magnus Hagander
• 20:36   Re: Summer of Code Preparation Robert Treat
• 20:49   Re: Summer of Code Preparation Josh Berkus
• 20:56   Rigth toolset to compile under mingw? Juan Manuel Diaz Lara
• 21:04   Re: Summer of Code Preparation Marc G. Fournier
• 22:20   Re: Speaking of pgstats Tom Lane

6 April 2006

• 00:04   Re: Summer of Code Preparation John DeSoi
• 00:21   Re: Speaking of pgstats Agent M
• 00:23   Anyone want to finish BEFORE COMMIT triggers? Josh Berkus
• 01:46   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Martin Scholes
• 02:05   Re: psql \c error Philip Yarra
• 02:22   Re: Speaking of pgstats Tom Lane
• 02:31   Re: Summer of Code Preparation Jim Nasby
• 02:31   Re: Summer of Code Preparation Jim Nasby
• 02:33   Re: commit callback, request Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:53   Re: Speaking of pgstats Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: Summer of Code Preparation Marc G. Fournier
• 03:27   Re: Summer of Code Preparation Qingqing Zhou
• 04:45   domain_in performance considerations Tom Lane
• 07:55   Re: Rigth toolset to compile under mingw? Albe Laurenz
• 08:07   Explaining Explain Luckys
• 10:32   Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Qingqing Zhou
• 10:41   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:31   Re: Summer of Code Preparation Jim C. Nasby
• 11:43   Re: Explaining Explain Nicolas Barbier
• 12:52   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Jonah H. Harris
• 12:57   Strange results from to_timestamp Mario Weilguni
• 13:01   Re: Strange results from to_timestamp Mario Weilguni
• 13:18   Re: Explaining Explain Robert Treat
• 13:46   About pg_hba.conf Gevik Babakhani
• 13:46   Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS] BUG #2374: Installation Error) Jim Nasby
• 13:55   Re: domain_in performance considerations Alvaro Herrera
• 14:00   Re: Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS] BUG #2374: Installation Error) Magnus Hagander
• 14:13   Re: domain_in performance considerations Tom Lane
• 14:13   Re: Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS] BUG #2374: Installation Tony Caduto
• 14:28   Re: About pg_hba.conf Svenne Krap
• 14:34   Re: About pg_hba.conf Tino Wildenhain
• 14:41   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Andrew Dunstan
• 14:51   Re: About pg_hba.conf Robert Treat
• 15:01   Re: About pg_hba.conf Gevik Babakhani
• 15:04   Re: About pg_hba.conf Chris Browne
• 15:18   Re: About pg_hba.conf Andrew Dunstan
• 15:30   Re: Strange results from to_timestamp William ZHANG
• 16:39   Re: Summer of Code Preparation Patrick Welche
• 16:56   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Thomas Hallgren
• 21:11   pgadmin III's Chinese simplified translations 孙高勇
• 21:11   Re: commit callback, request, SOLVED Horváth Sándor

7 April 2006

• 02:21   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Qingqing Zhou
• 03:40   Re: commit callback, request, SOLVED Tom Lane
• 04:09   Re: Strange results from to_timestamp Tom Lane
• 05:13   Re: Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS] BUG #2374: Installation Error) Jim C. Nasby
• 08:28   Re: pgadmin III's Chinese simplified translations Dave Page
• 12:00   Re: Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS] BUG #2374: Installation Error) Magnus Hagander
• 12:13   Re: Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS] BUG #2374: Installation Error) Dave Page
• 13:03   Re: Strange results from to_timestamp Adrian Maier
• 13:05   GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Teodor Sigaev
• 13:08   Re: Strange results from to_timestamp Mario Weilguni
• 13:24   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:41   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Nicolas Barbier
• 13:52   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Oleg Bartunov
• 13:53   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Oleg Bartunov
• 14:22   Re: WAL Bypass for indexes Tom Lane
• 14:49   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Mike Rylander
• 16:35   FW: [GENERAL] stored proc vs sql query string Jim Nasby
• 20:10   please actualize FAQ, broken urls Pavel Stehule

8 April 2006

• 00:53   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Josh Berkus
• 01:00   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Jonah H. Harris
• 02:35   Re: please actualize FAQ, broken urls Robert Treat
• 06:26   Re: Tru64/Alpha problems Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 06:49   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Tom Lane
• 16:33   How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) ? Juan Manuel Diaz Lara
• 16:46   Re: How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) ? Tom Lane
• 17:16   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Jonah H. Harris
• 17:26   Re: How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) ? Michael Fuhr
• 17:42   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Markus Schiltknecht
• 17:45   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Jonah H. Harris
• 18:03   Re: How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) Jan Wieck
• 18:20   Re: How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) Jonah H. Harris
• 18:52   Re: ERROR: record type has not been registered on CVS head Tom Lane
• 19:04   Re: How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) Tom Lane
• 19:19   Re: How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) Jonah H. Harris
• 19:54   Summer of Code -- mentors needed as well Josh Berkus
• 19:57   FOUND not set by EXECUTE? David Wheeler
• 20:11   Re: Summer of Code -- mentors needed as well Simon Riggs
• 21:38   Re: FOUND not set by EXECUTE? Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Tom Lane
• 22:07   Re: How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) David Fetter
• 22:21   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Jonah H. Harris
• 22:26   Re: How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) Jonah H. Harris

9 April 2006

• 00:43   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Gregory Maxwell
• 01:08   Re: FOUND not set by EXECUTE? David Wheeler
• 01:47   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Luke Lonergan
• 02:34   "Fat" binaries for OS X (was Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Library natively available for Mac OSX Intel?) Tom Lane
• 03:18   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Bruce Momjian
• 04:57   Re: How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:04   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Myron Scott
• 05:29   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Luke Lonergan
• 09:02   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Hannu Krosing
• 09:11   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Qingqing Zhou
• 13:40   Re: "Fat" binaries for OS X (was Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Library natively available for Mac OSX Intel?) Philipp Ott
• 15:23   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Myron Scott
• 16:27   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:27   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Tom Lane
• 16:34   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Tom Lane
• 16:58   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Jonah H. Harris
• 17:11   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Myron Scott
• 18:18   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Gregory Maxwell
• 18:39   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Tom Lane
• 18:49   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Tom Lane
• 18:57   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Jonah H. Harris
• 19:11   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Tom Lane
• 19:15   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Jonah H. Harris
• 19:18   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Alvaro Herrera
• 20:19   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor lister@sacadia.com
• 20:26   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Luke Lonergan
• 20:37   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Gregory Maxwell
• 20:46   Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync Bruce Momjian
• 20:52   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Luke Lonergan
• 21:00   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Luke Lonergan
• 21:04   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Gregory Maxwell
• 21:55   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Tom Lane

10 April 2006

• 00:29   Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync Andrew Dunstan
• 01:08   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Joshua D. Drake
• 02:41   FYI: summer plans Neil Conway
• 02:47   WIP: master-slave seqscan patch Qingqing Zhou
• 08:03   Updating OID column Peter Eisentraut
• 08:08   TSearch stemmers on win32 Magnus Hagander
• 08:34   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Markus Schiltknecht
• 08:41   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Qingqing Zhou
• 08:45   Re: Updating OID column Qingqing Zhou
• 08:48   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Simon Riggs
• 09:08   Re: Updating OID column Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:10   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Markus Schiltknecht
• 09:17   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:25   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Qingqing Zhou
• 09:27   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Hannu Krosing
• 09:42   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Markus Schiltknecht
• 09:45   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Richard Huxton
• 15:29   Re: Updating OID column Tom Lane
• 16:18   Re: Updating OID column Peter Eisentraut
• 17:36   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Alvaro Herrera
• 19:48   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Markus Schiltknecht
• 20:19   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Luke Lonergan
• 20:24   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Luke Lonergan
• 20:41   Re: Role incompatibilities Bruce Momjian
• 20:50   using eclipse to compiler and debug the source code 李峰
• 21:02   Re: Domains as Subtypes Bruce Momjian
• 21:28   Re: Remote administration contrib module Bruce Momjian
• 21:42   Re: Domains as Subtypes Tom Lane
• 21:43   Re: Remote administration contrib module Peter Eisentraut
• 21:49   Re: Remote administration contrib module Bruce Momjian
• 22:04   Re: [GENERAL] PANIC: heap_update_redo: no block Bruce Momjian
• 22:10   Re: Remote administration contrib module Dave Page

11 April 2006

• 01:25   plpgsql by default (was: Re: Remote administration contrib module) Andrew - Supernews
• 02:35   Re: psql -p 5433; create database test; \c test failing Bruce Momjian
• 02:36   Re: Domains as Subtypes Bruce Momjian
• 02:57   Re: plpgsql by default (was: Re: Remote administration contrib module) Tom Lane
• 03:26   Re: plpgsql by default (was: Re: Remote administration contrib module) Andrew - Supernews
• 03:46   Re: plpgsql by default Joshua D. Drake
• 03:55   OS X and Slony Jamie Deppeler
• 04:06   Re: OS X and Slony Josh Berkus
• 04:14   Re: plpgsql by default Marc G. Fournier
• 04:47   Re: plpgsql by default Tom Lane
• 06:03   Re: plpgsql by default David Fetter
• 06:05   Re: plpgsql by default Andrew - Supernews
• 06:16   Re: psql -p 5433; create database test; \c test failing David Fetter
• 07:35   Question on win32 semaphore simulation Qingqing Zhou
• 08:07   Re: plpgsql by default Richard Huxton
• 08:37   Re: plpgsql by default Andrew - Supernews
• 12:49   Re: using eclipse to compiler and debug the source code Dave Cramer
• 14:50   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Myron Scott
• 15:01   Suboptimal evaluation of CASE expressions Andreas Tille
• 15:23   Re: Suboptimal evaluation of CASE expressions Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:55   Re: Suboptimal evaluation of CASE expressions Tom Lane
• 16:13   Re: Suboptimal evaluation of CASE expressions Andreas Tille
• 16:37   RH9 postgresql 8.0.7 rpm Gaetano Mendola
• 16:44   Re: plpgsql by default Joshua D. Drake
• 16:45   Re: plpgsql by default Joshua D. Drake
• 16:47   Re: plpgsql by default Joshua D. Drake
• 17:16   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Greg Stark
• 17:20   Re: RH9 postgresql 8.0.7 rpm Joshua D. Drake
• 17:20   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Alvaro Herrera
• 17:28   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Greg Stark
• 17:52   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Myron Scott
• 17:54   adding fields to pg_database Markus Schiltknecht
• 18:00   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Greg Stark
• 18:06   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Alvaro Herrera
• 18:07   Re: adding fields to pg_database Jonah H. Harris
• 18:17   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Joshua D. Drake
• 18:20   Re: adding fields to pg_database Markus Schiltknecht
• 18:21   Re: adding fields to pg_database Jonah H. Harris
• 18:32   Re: adding fields to pg_database Tom Lane
• 18:48   Re: adding fields to pg_database Jonah H. Harris
• 19:22   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Greg Stark
• 19:57   pg_contrib default schema Thomas Sondag
• 20:02   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Bruce Momjian
• 20:16   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Stephen Frost
• 20:20   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Bruce Momjian
• 20:31   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Stephen Frost
• 20:32   Re: semaphore usage "port based"? Bruce Momjian
• 20:34   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Jim C. Nasby
• 20:48   Re: plpgsql by default Jim C. Nasby
• 20:55   Re: [PATCHES] schema-qualified SET CONSTRAINTS Kris Jurka
• 20:57   Re: plpgsql by default Tom Lane
• 20:58   OS cached buffers (was: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor) Jim C. Nasby
• 21:03   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Jim C. Nasby
• 21:03   Re: plpgsql by default David Fetter
• 21:06   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Jim C. Nasby
• 21:14   Re: plpgsql by default Tom Lane
• 21:16   Re: plpgsql by default David Fetter
• 21:28   Re: plpgsql by default Tom Lane
• 21:35   Re: Suboptimal evaluation of CASE expressions Andreas Tille
• 22:08   Re: plpgsql by default Mischa Sandberg
• 22:11   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Joshua D. Drake
• 22:13   Re: plpgsql by default Marc G. Fournier
• 22:13   Re: Suboptimal evaluation of CASE expressions Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:17   Re: plpgsql by default David Fetter
• 22:22   Re: Suboptimal evaluation of CASE expressions Tom Lane
• 22:24   Re: How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) Jim C. Nasby
• 22:28   Re: plpgsql by default Thomas Hallgren
• 22:28   Re: plpgsql by default Joshua D. Drake
• 22:30   Re: plpgsql by default Andrew - Supernews
• 22:30   Re: plpgsql by default Andrew - Supernews
• 22:31   Re: plpgsql by default Neil Conway
• 22:33   Re: Suboptimal evaluation of CASE expressions Tom Lane
• 22:37   Re: plpgsql by default Marc G. Fournier
• 22:44   Re: plpgsql by default Joshua D. Drake
• 22:53   Re: plpgsql by default Jim C. Nasby
• 22:57   GPUSort project Mischa Sandberg
• 23:01   Re: plpgsql by default Joshua D. Drake
• 23:51   Re: How to implement oracle like rownum(function or seudocolumn) Nicolas Barbier

12 April 2006

• 04:17   Re: plpgsql by default Josh Berkus
• 05:20   Re: GPUSort project Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:46   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Richard Huxton
• 08:57   Re: [PATCHES] schema-qualified SET CONSTRAINTS Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 10:20   Re: RH9 postgresql 8.0.7 rpm Devrim GUNDUZ
• 10:33   Re: plpgsql by default Peter Eisentraut
• 10:54   Re: plpgsql by default Dave Page
• 14:11   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Tom Lane
• 14:25   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Richard Huxton
• 14:28   Re: plpgsql by default Andreas Pflug
• 14:46   Re: plpgsql by default Bort, Paul
• 14:53   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Thomas Hallgren
• 15:30   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Jim C. Nasby
• 15:47   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Hannu Krosing
• 15:48   Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:53   Re: plpgsql by default David Fetter
• 16:04   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 16:15   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:21   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Greg Sabino Mullane
• 16:22   Re: plpgsql by default Merlin Moncure
• 16:25   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 16:32   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Tom Lane
• 16:40   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Mischa Sandberg
• 16:56   Re: GPUSort project Mischa Sandberg
• 17:02   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Mischa Sandberg
• 17:15   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Andreas Pflug
• 17:16   Re: plpgsql by default Eric Lauzon
• 17:24   Re: plpgsql by default Andreas Pflug
• 17:38   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 17:41   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 17:56   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:59   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:15   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Magnus Hagander
• 19:13   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:31   Re: GPUSort project Simon Riggs
• 19:38   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Jim C. Nasby
• 20:18   Re: GPUSort project Mischa Sandberg
• 21:33   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Germán Poó Caamaño
• 21:41   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Tom Lane
• 21:42   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Alvaro Herrera
• 22:00   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Hannu Krosing
• 22:02   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Tom Lane
• 22:04   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Hannu Krosing
• 22:09   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Dave Page
• 22:35   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Josh Berkus
• 22:40   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Greg Stark
• 22:40   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:00   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Jim C. Nasby
• 23:28   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Alvaro Herrera

13 April 2006

• 00:07   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Jim C. Nasby
• 02:31   Re: Control File Bruce Momjian
• 02:39   Re: Speaking of pgstats Bruce Momjian
• 04:57   Re: Control File Tom Lane
• 06:52   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 06:57   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:23   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Dave Page
• 07:27   Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables Dave Page
• 07:49   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 08:14   Possible race in UnlockBuffers() and UnpinBuffer() Qingqing Zhou
• 08:15   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:26   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 08:40   Re: Control File Bruce Momjian
• 10:43   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 10:50   Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor Bruce Momjian
• 10:54   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:56   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 11:12   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 11:34   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:48   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 11:54   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 12:09   Re: please actualize FAQ, broken urls Bruce Momjian
• 12:13   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 12:13   Re: please actualize FAQ, broken urls Pavel Stehule
• 12:15   Re: please actualize FAQ, broken urls Bruce Momjian
• 12:31   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 12:47   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:53   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 13:01   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 13:07   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 13:08   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:21   two-argument aggregates and SQL 2003 Sergey E. Koposov
• 13:33   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 13:50   Re: plpgsql by default Bruce Momjian
• 13:58   Re: GPUSort project Benny Amorsen
• 14:19   Re: GPUSort project mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 14:35   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Greg Stark
• 15:22   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 15:23   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:32   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 15:32   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:34   Re: two-argument aggregates and SQL 2003 Tom Lane
• 15:52   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Tom Lane
• 15:53   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 16:00   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Tom Lane
• 16:06   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Greg Stark
• 16:07   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 16:22   Re: Possible race in UnlockBuffers() and UnpinBuffer() Tom Lane
• 16:36   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:32   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:38   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Greg Stark
• 18:17   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Tom Lane
• 19:28   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 19:38   Re: OS cached buffers (was: Support Parallel Query Execution Bruce Momjian
• 19:41   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 20:26   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Greg Stark
• 20:40   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 20:52   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:16   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Bruce Momjian

14 April 2006

• 01:00   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Tom Lane
• 01:38   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:18   Re: Control File Jim C. Nasby
• 04:45   Re: OS cached buffers (was: Support Parallel Query Execution Jim C. Nasby
• 08:05   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 09:27   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Greg Stark
• 09:42   Re: Control File Andreas Pflug
• 13:47   Re: OS cached buffers (was: Support Parallel Query Execution Bruce Momjian
• 14:43   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Greg Stark
• 14:54   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:01   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:10   Re: Control File Tom Lane
• 15:22   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:35   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 15:42   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Bruce Momjian
• 15:50   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 15:58   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Bruce Momjian
• 16:10   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL Joshua D. Drake
• 16:40   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 16:45   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Dave Page
• 16:47   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:01   Re: two-argument aggregates and SQL 2003 Sergey E. Koposov
• 17:03   Problem compiling from cvs, mingw Juan Manuel Diaz Lara
• 17:05   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Tom Lane
• 17:18   Re: two-argument aggregates and SQL 2003 Tom Lane
• 17:51   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:28   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Greg Stark
• 18:41   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 19:57   Re: two-argument aggregates and SQL 2003 Mark Dilger
• 20:40   Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Tom Lane
• 21:05   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Hannu Krosing
• 21:31   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Tom Lane
• 21:55   Summer of Code Jonah H. Harris
• 22:00   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Stephen Frost
• 22:01   Re: Summer of Code Josh Berkus
• 22:37   Re: two-argument aggregates and SQL 2003 Tom Lane
• 23:04   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? markir@paradise.net.nz

15 April 2006

• 02:52   Re: Possible race in UnlockBuffers() and UnpinBuffer() Qingqing Zhou
• 04:22   Re: Possible race in UnlockBuffers() and UnpinBuffer() Tom Lane
• 04:51   Re: two-argument aggregates and SQL 2003 Tom Lane
• 08:08   Re: libpq Describe Extension [WAS: Bytea and perl] Volkan YAZICI
• 08:11   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Florian Weimer
• 11:59   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Hannu Krosing
• 13:48   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Bruce Momjian
• 15:45   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Tom Lane
• 15:49   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Tom Lane
• 15:55   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Bruce Momjian
• 16:53   Time for new releases? Devrim GUNDUZ
• 18:35   Re: Time for new releases? Marc G. Fournier
• 19:04   Re: Control File Jim C. Nasby
• 19:05   Google SoC--Idea Request Jonah H. Harris
• 19:07   Re: Control File Jim C. Nasby
• 19:10   Re: Control File Tom Lane
• 19:12   Re: two-argument aggregates and SQL 2003 Jim C. Nasby
• 19:22   Re: two-argument aggregates and SQL 2003 Tom Lane
• 20:25   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Dave Page
• 23:02   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Neil Conway
• 23:23   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Hannu Krosing
• 23:25   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jonah H. Harris

16 April 2006

• 01:41   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Bruce Momjian
• 02:44   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Robert Treat
• 02:45   Help about physical page layout in PostgreSQL: yy h
• 02:52   Re: Help about physical page layout in PostgreSQL: Tom Lane
• 03:54   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:29   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Dave Page
• 09:00   TODO: Update pg_dump and psql to use the new COPY libpq API Volkan YAZICI
• 11:14   Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Gevik Babakhani
• 11:38   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Marko Kreen
• 13:00   Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:38   Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Tino Wildenhain
• 14:08   Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:31   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Tom Lane
• 15:47   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Simon Riggs
• 15:48   Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Tom Lane
• 16:33   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:34   Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Gevik Babakhani
• 19:50   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Hannu Krosing
• 20:25   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Tom Lane
• 20:29   Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:40   A successor for PQgetssl Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:45   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Tom Lane
• 20:55   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Tom Lane
• 21:08   Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Tom Lane
• 21:19   Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Tom Lane
• 21:29   Re: A successor for PQgetssl Tom Lane
• 21:30   Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:18   Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Gevik Babakhani
• 23:54   Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Sander Steffann

17 April 2006

• 02:36   Corrupt data pages... Kevin Brown
• 02:48   Re: Corrupt data pages... Tom Lane
• 03:18   Re: TODO: Update pg_dump and psql to use the new COPY libpq Bruce Momjian
• 11:16   Re: [GENERAL] Google Summer of Code (Fix aggregate operators & Implement features such as Data Cubes and Skyline) Robert Treat
• 12:16   Re: Control File Bruno Almeida do Lago
• 12:28   Re: Control File Bruno Almeida do Lago
• 12:38   plpython improvements on patches Hannu Krosing
• 13:32   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Ned Lilly
• 13:59   Re: Control File Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: A successor for PQgetssl Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:28   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Bruce Momjian
• 14:34   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Stephen Frost
• 15:06   Re: A successor for PQgetssl Tom Lane
• 15:06   Re: A successor for PQgetssl Stephen Frost
• 15:25   Re: A successor for PQgetssl Tom Lane
• 15:32   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Jim C. Nasby
• 15:40   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Tom Lane
• 15:47   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Bruce Momjian
• 15:54   Re: A successor for PQgetssl Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:04   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Joshua D. Drake
• 16:12   Re: A successor for PQgetssl Stephen Frost
• 16:14   Re: A successor for PQgetssl Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:25   Re: A successor for PQgetssl Stephen Frost
• 16:47   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Tom Lane
• 17:35   Parser jengono1@gmail.com
• 17:46   Re: A successor for PQgetssl Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:48   Re: Parser Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:51   Re: Parser Peter Eisentraut
• 17:52   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Bruce Momjian
• 17:58   Re: A successor for PQgetssl Stephen Frost
• 19:01   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Tom Lane
• 19:06   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Bruce Momjian
• 19:19   CVS tags Jim C. Nasby
• 19:43   Re: CVS tags Tom Lane
• 20:05   Re: Corrupt data pages... Kevin Brown
• 20:46   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Jim C. Nasby
• 20:48   Re: Corrupt data pages... Kevin Brown
• 20:55   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jim C. Nasby
• 21:14   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Bruce Momjian
• 21:25   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? Bruce Momjian
• 21:55   Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL Gevik Babakhani
• 22:29   question regarding pg_database.h and DatabaseRelationId Gevik Babakhani
• 22:45   Re: question regarding pg_database.h and DatabaseRelationId Peter Eisentraut
• 23:05   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Simon Riggs

18 April 2006

• 03:02   Re: Question on win32 semaphore simulation Qingqing Zhou
• 04:17   how can i get the binary format of timestamp? energumen@buaa.edu.cn
• 08:14   Re: question regarding pg_database.h and DatabaseRelationId Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:47   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Hannu Krosing
• 11:33   Re: Question on win32 semaphore simulation Magnus Hagander
• 12:44   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Bruce Momjian
• 13:48   Re: how can i get the binary format of timestamp? Tom Lane
• 14:15   Re: Question on win32 semaphore simulation Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: Question on win32 semaphore simulation Magnus Hagander
• 15:16   Re: CVS tags Jim C. Nasby
• 15:41   Re: CVS tags Marc G. Fournier
• 16:57   Re: Corrupt data pages... Tom Lane
• 17:26   Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with Joshua D. Drake
• 17:27   Re: Summer of Code Mark Wong
• 18:31   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Mark Wong
• 19:11   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jim C. Nasby
• 20:10   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jonah H. Harris
• 20:59   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Mark Wong

19 April 2006

• 00:06   Re: Corrupt data pages... Kevin Brown
• 03:11   Re: Strange results from to_timestamp Bruce Momjian
• 03:17   Re: Question on win32 semaphore simulation Qingqing Zhou
• 04:04   Re: Question on win32 semaphore simulation Qingqing Zhou
• 05:20   Re: Question on win32 semaphore simulation Tom Lane
• 06:58   Re: how can i get the binary format of timestamp? energumen@buaa.edu.cn
• 09:02   Re: Question on win32 semaphore simulation Magnus Hagander
• 09:31   concurrent transactions inside the same connection Adrian Maier
• 09:44   Re: concurrent transactions inside the same connection Albe Laurenz
• 10:25   Re: concurrent transactions inside the same connection Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:53   Re: how can i get the binary format of timestamp? Tom Lane
• 15:36   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request John DeSoi
• 16:09   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jonah H. Harris
• 16:10   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Joshua D. Drake
• 16:12   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Alvaro Herrera
• 16:14   Who is responsible for ECPG? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:19   Re: Who is responsible for ECPG? Tom Lane
• 18:49   Re: Strange results from to_timestamp Bruce Momjian
• 18:52   Re: Strange results from to_timestamp Bruce Momjian
• 20:12   Triage Coverity Martijn van Oosterhout

20 April 2006

• 01:35   phpPgAdmin looking for developers Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:18   parser error when trying to connect to postges db from tomcat danish.siddiqui@hovservices.com
• 03:22   Re: phpPgAdmin looking for developers Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:32   pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Yoshiyuki Asaba
• 07:17   pgfoundry - news - is working? Pavel Stehule
• 07:41   please change url for czech postgresql site Pavel Stehule
• 08:48   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Magnus Hagander
• 10:34   Re: float8 regression test failure in head Bruce Momjian
• 10:45   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Peter Eisentraut
• 11:02   Unresolved Win32 bug reports Bruce Momjian
• 11:03   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Magnus Hagander
• 11:05   Checking assumptions Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:19   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Magnus Hagander
• 11:19   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Peter Eisentraut
• 11:21   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Magnus Hagander
• 11:53   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Peter Eisentraut
• 12:51   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Robert Treat
• 12:55   Re: please change url for czech postgresql site Robert Treat
• 13:44   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Magnus Hagander
• 14:00   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Magnus Hagander
• 14:05   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:10   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Tom Lane
• 14:30   Re: please change url for czech postgresql site Pavel Stehule
• 14:38   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Yoshiyuki Asaba
• 14:42   Re: float8 regression test failure in head Tom Lane
• 14:54   Re: Checking assumptions Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Magnus Hagander
• 15:04   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Tom Lane
• 15:11   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Tom Lane
• 15:41   TODO item pg_hba.conf Gevik Babakhani
• 15:48   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:50   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Magnus Hagander
• 15:56   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Tom Lane
• 15:57   Re: float8 regression test failure in head Bruce Momjian
• 16:07   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Tom Lane
• 16:35   Re: float8 regression test failure in head Patrick Welche
• 16:51   Re: float8 regression test failure in head Tom Lane
• 17:02   Re: Checking assumptions Tom Lane
• 17:17   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Jim C. Nasby
• 17:25   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:35   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Magnus Hagander
• 17:55   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Tom Lane
• 17:59   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Jim C. Nasby
• 18:00   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jim C. Nasby
• 18:06   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Magnus Hagander
• 18:14   Re: TODO item pg_hba.conf Tom Lane
• 18:17   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 18:51   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Jim C. Nasby
• 18:53   Re: TODO item pg_hba.conf Gevik Babakhani
• 19:05   Re: TODO item pg_hba.conf Alvaro Herrera
• 19:15   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Larry Rosenman
• 19:15   Re: TODO item pg_hba.conf Gevik Babakhani
• 19:17   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Larry Rosenman
• 20:12   Re: TODO item pg_hba.conf Tom Lane
• 20:14   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Jim C. Nasby
• 20:29   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Bort, Paul
• 21:13   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Martijn van Oosterhout

21 April 2006

• 00:31   UPDATE on many-column tables (was Re: [PERFORM] Performance decrease) Tom Lane
• 01:08   Re: Checking assumptions Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:10   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:59   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Andrew Dunstan
• 08:28   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Andreas Pflug
• 09:11   Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 09:49   TODO item question [pg_hba.conf] Gevik Babakhani
• 13:07   Re: Checking assumptions Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:36   Re: TODO item question [pg_hba.conf] Alvaro Herrera
• 15:21   Re: TODO item question [pg_hba.conf] Gevik Babakhani
• 15:39   Re: Checking assumptions Bruce Momjian
• 16:26   Re: TODO item question [pg_hba.conf] Alvaro Herrera
• 17:01   Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Tom Lane
• 17:15   Re: TODO item question [pg_hba.conf] Tom Lane
• 17:39   Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Jonah H. Harris
• 18:11   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jim C. Nasby
• 18:18   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jonah H. Harris
• 20:46   Re: TODO item pg_hba.conf Bruce Momjian
• 20:55   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? Bruce Momjian
• 21:28   Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Simon Riggs
• 21:36   plperl on AIX John F Rizzo
• 21:38   Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Tom Lane
• 21:48   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Robert Treat
• 21:57   Re: plperl on AIX Tom Lane
• 22:01   Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? David Wheeler
• 22:35   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jim C. Nasby
• 22:50   Simplifying Param lookups Tom Lane
• 23:01   Re: Simplifying Param lookups Bruce Momjian
• 23:12   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Andreas Pflug
• 23:15   Re: TODO item question [pg_hba.conf] Gevik Babakhani
• 23:27   Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Simon Riggs
• 23:30   Re: Win32 sysconfig -> pg_service.conf Bruce Momjian
• 23:53   Re: proposal - plpgsql: execute using into Bruce Momjian

22 April 2006

• 01:40   Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Tom Lane
• 03:07   Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem Bruce Momjian
• 07:15   TODO items.. Dhanaraj M
• 11:50   Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem Simon Riggs
• 15:11   Re: obtaining row locking information Bruce Momjian
• 15:24   Re: TODO items.. Alvaro Herrera
• 15:38   Re: TODO items.. Gevik Babakhani
• 15:57   Re: TODO items.. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:08   Re: TODO items.. Bruce Momjian
• 17:17   Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem Tom Lane
• 17:26   Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem Jim C. Nasby
• 17:34   Re: TODO items.. Tom Lane
• 18:18   Re: TODO items.. Bruce Momjian
• 18:38   Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem Simon Riggs
• 20:44   Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem daveg
• 20:49   Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem David Fetter
• 21:14   Question about the MemoryContext Gevik Babakhani
• 21:20   Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem daveg
• 22:16   Re: Question about the MemoryContext Tom Lane
• 22:44   Re: Question about the MemoryContext Gevik Babakhani
• 23:25   Re: obtaining row locking information Tatsuo Ishii

23 April 2006

• 00:21   Re: obtaining row locking information Bruce Momjian
• 01:14   Re: obtaining row locking information Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:26   Re: plperl on AIX Christopher Browne
• 04:26   Re: [GENERAL] Transaction eating up all RAM Bruce Momjian
• 09:06   Question about dependency functions in the backend Gevik Babakhani
• 15:05   Re: Automatically setting work_mem Bruno Wolff III
• 15:06   Re: TODO items.. Robert Treat
• 15:07   Re: TODO items.. Robert Treat
• 15:44   Re: TODO items.. Alvaro Herrera
• 15:54   Re: TODO items.. Stephen Frost
• 16:18   using dll in am David Hoksza
• 17:47   Re: using dll in am Tom Lane
• 18:05   Re: using dll in am Magnus Hagander
• 19:06   Re: using dll in am David Hoksza
• 19:12   Re: using dll in am David Hoksza
• 20:09   Re: TODO items.. Robert Treat
• 20:49   Regression error on float8 Magnus Hagander
• 21:34   Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf Alvaro Herrera
• 21:41   Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf Gevik Babakhani
• 21:45   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Alvaro Herrera
• 22:00   Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:17   Protocol Message Graph Agent M
• 22:27   Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf Alvaro Herrera
• 22:27   Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf Gevik Babakhani
• 22:29   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jonah H. Harris
• 22:36   Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf Alvaro Herrera
• 22:44   Re: Question about dependency functions in the backend Alvaro Herrera
• 23:05   Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf Gevik Babakhani
• 23:14   Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf Tom Lane
• 23:16   Re: Protocol Message Graph Alvaro Herrera
• 23:22   Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf Tom Lane
• 23:27   Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf Tom Lane
• 23:28   Can't commit due to perl upgrade Alvaro Herrera
• 23:29   Re: Please advice TODO Item pg_hba.conf Gevik Babakhani
• 23:30   Re: Protocol Message Graph Agent M
• 23:45   Re: Regression error on float8 Tom Lane

24 April 2006

• 01:17   Re: Can't commit due to perl upgrade Marc G. Fournier
• 01:41   Re: Can't commit due to perl upgrade Alvaro Herrera
• 02:02   Index scans when bitmap scans disabled Michael Fuhr
• 02:26   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Qingqing Zhou
• 04:50   Re: Index scans when bitmap scans disabled Tom Lane
• 05:39   Re: Index scans when bitmap scans disabled Michael Fuhr
• 07:22   Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Qingqing Zhou
• 08:31   bug# 2073 - Clarification Dhanaraj M
• 17:31   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Alvaro Herrera
• 17:40   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Jim C. Nasby
• 17:41   2x compile warning Gevik Babakhani
• 17:45   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jim C. Nasby
• 17:54   ecpg memory leaks Michael Meskes
• 17:56   Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Gavin Hamill
• 17:58   TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Gevik Babakhani
• 18:03   Re: Regression error on float8 Magnus Hagander
• 18:15   Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention Mark Wong
• 18:46   Re: bug# 2073 - Clarification Tom Lane
• 19:06   Re: 2x compile warning Kris Jurka
• 19:22   Re: Regression error on float8 Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:51   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Gevik Babakhani
• 20:07   Re: 2x compile warning Tom Lane
• 20:07   Re: Regression error on float8 Tom Lane
• 20:08   Re: 2x compile warning Bruce Momjian
• 20:14   Re: Regression error on float8 Magnus Hagander
• 20:17   Re: 2x compile warning Bruce Momjian
• 20:30   Re: Regression error on float8 Tom Lane
• 20:38   Re: Regression error on float8 Magnus Hagander
• 20:55   Re: 2x compile warning Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:07   Re: 2x compile warning Kris Jurka
• 21:13   Re: pgsql: Improve our private implementation of cbrt() to give results of Magnus Hagander
• 21:39   Re: 2x compile warning Tom Lane
• 21:57   Re: 2x compile warning Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:05   Re: 2x compile warning Bruce Momjian
• 22:12   Re: 2x compile warning Kris Jurka
• 22:22   Re: 2x compile warning Bruce Momjian
• 22:55   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Jim C. Nasby

25 April 2006

• 00:14   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Tom Lane
• 00:19   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Jim C. Nasby
• 00:42   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Tom Lane
• 00:55   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Jim C. Nasby
• 01:13   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Gevik Babakhani
• 01:41   Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports Qingqing Zhou
• 02:36   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Tom Lane
• 02:56   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jonah H. Harris
• 03:06   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Tom Lane
• 03:06   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Wes
• 03:07   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Alvaro Herrera
• 03:12   Re: Checking assumptions Bruce Momjian
• 03:12   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jonah H. Harris
• 03:16   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Tom Lane
• 03:39   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Wes
• 04:03   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Tom Lane
• 05:00   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jim C. Nasby
• 05:51   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jonah H. Harris
• 05:57   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Wes
• 06:01   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Tom Lane
• 06:06   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Andrew Dunstan
• 06:17   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Tom Lane
• 06:44   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request ipig
• 06:54   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Wes
• 07:18   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Tom Lane
• 08:13   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Gevik Babakhani
• 08:16   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Gevik Babakhani
• 08:25   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 10:16   Re: Checking assumptions Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:53   Summary of coverity bugs Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:09   Re: Summary of coverity bugs Csaba Nagy
• 12:29   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Bort, Paul
• 12:40   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jonah H. Harris
• 12:40   Re: Protocol Message Graph Simon Riggs
• 12:51   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Alvaro Herrera
• 12:53   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Alvaro Herrera
• 12:56   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Stephen Frost
• 12:59   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Alvaro Herrera
• 13:00   Re: Summary of coverity bugs Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:17   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Bruce Momjian
• 13:33   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Wes
• 14:19   Re: [PATCHES] Implementing RESET CONNECTION ... Bruce Momjian
• 14:28   Re: [PATCHES] Implementing RESET CONNECTION ... A.M.
• 14:55   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 14:58   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Tom Lane
• 15:00   FOR UPDATE lock problem ? REYNAUD Jean-Samuel
• 15:09   Re: Google SoC--Idea Request Jim C. Nasby
• 15:13   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Gevik Babakhani
• 15:17   Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT Tom Lane
• 15:27   Re: [PATCHES] Implementing RESET CONNECTION ... Tom Lane
• 15:44   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Wes
• 15:47   Re: FOR UPDATE lock problem ? Tom Lane
• 15:51   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Tom Lane
• 16:23   Installation on Duel-Core Pentium XP Ben Clewett
• 16:48   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Alvaro Herrera
• 16:56   Re: FOR UPDATE lock problem ? Tom Lane
• 17:24   Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes Tom Lane
• 17:25   Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes) Jim C. Nasby
• 17:36   ISBN/ISSN/ISMN/EAN13 module Jeremy Kronuz
• 17:41   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:44   Avoiding redundant fetches of btree index metapages Tom Lane
• 17:53   Re: Avoiding redundant fetches of btree index metapages Alvaro Herrera
• 17:58   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes) Tom Lane
• 18:40   Re: Installation on Duel-Core Pentium XP Dave Page
• 18:57   Re: Catalog Access Joshua D. Drake
• 19:13   Re: Catalog Access Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:36   Re: Catalog Access Joshua D. Drake
• 20:31   ACL_CONNECT patch 6 Gevik Babakhani
• 22:13   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem Hannu Krosing
• 22:28   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem Alvaro Herrera
• 23:16   Re: ACL_CONNECT p.tch 6 Alvaro Herrera

26 April 2006

• 00:45   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem Tom Lane
• 01:37   Re: Installation on Duel-Core Pentium XP Andrew Dunstan
• 14:23   GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 2. Teodor Sigaev
• 14:48   Re: Avoiding redundant fetches of btree index metapages Simon Riggs
• 15:38   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 2. Jeremy Drake
• 15:53   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 2. Teodor Sigaev
• 16:48   Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" Gevik Babakhani
• 16:54   Re: Avoiding redundant fetches of btree index metapages Tom Lane
• 17:29   Re: Avoiding redundant fetches of btree index metapages Simon Riggs
• 17:30   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" Stephen Frost
• 17:36   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE Gevik Babakhani
• 17:44   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" Stephen Frost
• 17:46   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" Tom Lane
• 17:56   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE Stephen Frost
• 18:05   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" Stephen Frost
• 18:14   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" Bruce Momjian
• 18:19   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" Alvaro Herrera
• 18:22   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" Stephen Frost
• 18:24   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE Gevik Babakhani
• 18:29   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" Stephen Frost
• 18:53   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" Alvaro Herrera
• 19:05   Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" Tom Lane
• 20:45   ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Taral
• 20:58   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Tom Lane
• 21:02   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:16   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:45   todo items history Gevik Babakhani
• 21:48   Re: todo items history Bruce Momjian
• 21:54   Re: todo items history Jim C. Nasby
• 22:07   Re: todo items history Gevik Babakhani
• 22:14   Re: todo items history Bruce Momjian
• 22:16   Re: todo items history Gevik Babakhani
• 22:22   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Taral
• 22:25   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem Wes
• 22:34   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem Jim C. Nasby
• 22:42   Re: pg_freespacemap question Bruce Momjian
• 22:43   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem Tom Lane
• 22:46   Re: [PATCHES] pg_freespacemap question Bruce Momjian
• 23:08   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem Jim C. Nasby
• 23:13   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem Tom Lane
• 23:20   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem Wes
• 23:22   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem Jim C. Nasby

27 April 2006

• 00:13   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Tom Lane
• 01:43   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 2. Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:43   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 2. Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:33   Re: Catalog Access (was: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem Wes
• 02:40   pg_dump Bob Shearer
• 03:42   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Greg Stark
• 04:53   Re: pg_dump Jim C. Nasby
• 04:59   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 07:24   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:46   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 10:07   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Andrew Dunstan
• 10:21   AMD64 dual core mutex/spinlock problem Zdenek Kotala
• 10:53   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:59   test Dave Cramer
• 13:26   Summer of Code idea Jesper Pedersen
• 13:45   Re: Summer of Code idea Alvaro Herrera
• 13:45   Re: Summer of Code idea Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:20   Re: Summer of Code idea Jonah H. Harris
• 14:40   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 14:49   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Tom Lane
• 15:08   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 15:20   Re: Summer of Code idea Stephen Frost
• 15:25   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 15:30   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:32   Re: Summer of Code idea Tom Lane
• 15:34   Re: Summer of Code idea Jonah H. Harris
• 15:43   Re: Summer of Code idea Jonah H. Harris
• 16:35   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Teodor Sigaev
• 16:44   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Greg Stark
• 16:47   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Alvaro Herrera
• 16:50   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Tom Lane
• 16:58   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Tom Lane
• 17:05   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Taral
• 17:10   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Taral
• 17:10   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Teodor Sigaev
• 17:14   AMD64 dual core mutex/spinlock problem Zdenek Kotala
• 17:22   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Taral
• 17:38   Logging pg_autovacuum Bruce Momjian
• 17:53   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:04   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Matthew T. O'Connor
• 18:32   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Bruce Momjian
• 18:42   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
• 18:54   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Teodor Sigaev
• 18:54   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Tom Lane
• 18:58   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Jonah H. Harris
• 19:22   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
• 19:26   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Greg Stark
• 19:42   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Taral
• 19:57   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Tom Lane
• 20:12   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Chris Browne
• 20:22   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Bruce Momjian
• 20:27   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
• 20:27   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Tom Lane
• 20:30   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
• 20:34   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 20:43   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Tom Lane
• 20:51   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
• 21:20   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 21:40   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Simon Riggs
• 21:43   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
• 21:59   Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules Rocco Altier

28 April 2006

• 00:42   Re: Summer of Code idea Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:45   Re: Summer of Code idea Jonah H. Harris
• 00:49   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:51   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:24   Constraint Exclusion + Joins? Brandon Black
• 03:55   Re: Summer of Code idea Alvaro Herrera
• 04:41   Re: Summer of Code idea Jonah H. Harris
• 04:41   Re: Constraint Exclusion + Joins? Tom Lane
• 11:31   plpgsql cant to set role from function. is bug? Pavel Stehule
• 11:37   plpgsql cant to set role from function. is bug?, SOLVED Pavel Stehule
• 13:41   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Teodor Sigaev
• 14:14   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Tom Lane
• 14:28   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:45   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Teodor Sigaev
• 15:05   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Tom Lane
• 15:44   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Teodor Sigaev
• 15:53   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Tom Lane
• 16:10   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
• 16:11   Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. Teodor Sigaev
• 19:03   Solaris ASM problem Bruce Momjian
• 19:07   Re: Constraint Exclusion + Joins? Brandon Black
• 19:58   Re: Automatic free space map filling Bruce Momjian
• 20:09   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Robert Treat
• 20:13   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
• 20:16   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:16   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Tom Lane
• 20:18   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Tom Lane
• 20:19   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
• 20:39   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:39   Re: Solaris ASM problem Kris Jurka
• 20:41   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Larry Rosenman
• 21:09   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 21:18   Re: Solaris ASM problem Kris Jurka
• 21:38   Re: Solaris ASM problem Kris Jurka
• 22:22   Add syntax position field to Vars? Tom Lane
• 23:06   Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging Bruce Momjian

29 April 2006

• 01:27   Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging Robert Treat
• 01:54   Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging Tom Lane
• 05:14   for statement, adding a STEP clause? Jaime Casanova
• 05:51   Re: for statement, adding a STEP clause? Tom Lane
• 06:10   Re: for statement, adding a STEP clause? Andrew Dunstan
• 08:56   Exports from postgres Magnus Hagander
• 10:39   Re: Exports from postgres Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:58   Re: Solaris ASM problem Bruce Momjian
• 13:42   stdout when running as a Windows service Thomas Hallgren
• 14:10   Re: Solaris ASM problem Theo Schlossnagle
• 14:10   Re: Solaris ASM problem Theo Schlossnagle
• 14:10   Re: Solaris ASM problem Theo Schlossnagle
• 14:10   Re: Solaris ASM problem Theo Schlossnagle
• 14:27   Re: stdout when running as a Windows service Dave Page
• 17:06   Re: Logging pg_autovacuum Mark Dilger
• 18:24   How to allocate a global variable (to implement virutal databases) Juan Manuel Diaz Lara
• 19:21   Re: How to allocate a global variable (to implement virutal databases) Tom Lane
• 19:22   Re: Exports from postgres Tom Lane
• 20:00   Re: How to allocate a global variable (to implement virutal databases) Juan Manuel Diaz Lara
• 20:14   Re: Exports from postgres Magnus Hagander
• 21:54   Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Tom Lane
• 23:40   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? mark@mark.mielke.cc

30 April 2006

• 00:58   Handling conflicting FOR UPDATE/SHARE specs Tom Lane
• 01:28   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Rod Taylor
• 07:34   Re: inet increment with int Bruce Momjian
• 08:06   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Tom Lane
• 09:06   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Magnus Hagander
• 09:21   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Rod Taylor
• 09:45   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Svenne Krap
• 10:29   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:29   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Thomas Hallgren
• 10:46   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Hannu Krosing
• 10:50   Finding the correct type Thomas Hallgren
• 10:59   Re: Finding the correct type Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:28   Re: Finding the correct type Thomas Hallgren
• 13:09   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 13:20   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 13:55   Re: Constraint Exclusion + Joins? Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:51   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Bruno Wolff III
• 16:15   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Mark Dilger
• 16:34   Altering view ownership doesn't work ... Tom Lane
• 16:54   Re: Altering view ownership doesn't work ... Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:17   Re: Altering view ownership doesn't work ... Tom Lane
• 18:06   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 21:05   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? elein
• 22:12   Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not? Mark Dilger