Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT
Date
Msg-id 9137.1145934968@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
>> If one is going to revoke the last ACL_CONNECT, a warning is going to
>> issued then that part of the REVOKE gets canceled.

> Humm, no, the WARNING is issued but the REVOKE is executed anyway.

Why are we debating this?  It won't get accepted anyway, because the
whole thing is silly.  Show me one other object type that we issue
such warnings for, or anyone else who has even suggested that we should.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Next
From: Wes
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes