Re: semaphore usage "port based"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: semaphore usage "port based"?
Date
Msg-id 20060402225215.I947@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: semaphore usage "port based"?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sent offlist ...

On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
>> On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> OK, could we see strace (or whatever BSD calls it) output for the second
>>> postmaster?  I'd like to see exactly what results it's getting for the
>>> kernel calls it makes during IpcSemaphoreCreate.
>
>> 'k, dont' know what strace is ... we have ktrace and truss ... truss is
>> what I usually use, and is:
>
> truss seems to have an output format closer to what I'm used to, but
> either will do.
>
>             regards, tom lane
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Bypass for indexes
Next
From: "Martin Scholes"
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Bypass for indexes