Re: semaphore usage "port based"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: semaphore usage "port based"?
Date
Msg-id 26796.1144028094@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: semaphore usage "port based"?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: semaphore usage "port based"?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK, could we see strace (or whatever BSD calls it) output for the second
>> postmaster?  I'd like to see exactly what results it's getting for the
>> kernel calls it makes during IpcSemaphoreCreate.

> 'k, dont' know what strace is ... we have ktrace and truss ... truss is 
> what I usually use, and is:

truss seems to have an output format closer to what I'm used to, but
either will do.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Bypass for indexes
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Bypass for indexes