Re: plpgsql by default - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: plpgsql by default
Date
Msg-id 20060411185240.S1096@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpgsql by default  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: plpgsql by default  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: plpgsql by default  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
>> Can you guarantee unequivocally that there are absolutely not security 
>> issues in plpgsql?
>
> Can you guarantee unequivocally that there are absolutely not security issues 
> in PostgreSQL?

No, but does that mean we should increase the potential by adding in 
something that not everyone that runs PostgreSQL actually uses?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Suboptimal evaluation of CASE expressions