Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor
Date
Msg-id 1144793466.13511.9.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> That's only going to be true for very high end systems with multiple raid
> controllers and dozens of spindles.

Not true. I have a system right now that would benifit. My database is
only 500 megs and I have 2 gig of ram and two processors... I only have
a raid 1, but that is o.k. because most things are cached in memory
anyway.

> 
> On the other hand even moderately sized dual-core systems could probably
> benefit from being able to perform multiple cpu-intensive operations
> simultaneously.

See above :)

Joshua D. Drake

> 
-- 
           === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===     Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency:
+1.800.492.2240    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mischa Sandberg
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql by default
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql by default