On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> No, but does that mean we should increase the potential by adding in
>> something that not everyone that runs PostgreSQL actually uses?
>
> Using this argument I could say that we don't need primary keys, foreign
> keys, views or rules. Especially the latter 3 ;).
*slap forehead* *groan*
then again, if we could pull it out and move it into loadable modules ...
hmmmm ... >:)
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
