Re: Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS] BUG #2374: Installation Error) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS] BUG #2374: Installation Error)
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9B3F@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS] BUG #2374: Installation Error)  (Jim Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Magnus Hagander
> Sent: 07 April 2006 13:00
> To: Jim C. Nasby
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS]
> BUG #2374: Installation Error)
>
> You won't get *more* responses to questinos by moving them to
> a forum where *less* people read them... What we need is to
> somehow get more people to respond to them, and I think
> that's easier to get done on the bugs list.

Not to mention that redirecting people will alienate them away from
PostgreSQL and make us come across as pedantic and unhelpful. Just
because we see a distinction between the source code and our binary
installers (be they RPM, Win32 or whatever) doesn't mean that the rest
of the world will. They downloaded PostgreSQL, from the PostgreSQL
website, so will go to the PostgreSQL bugs page to report bugs or
problems (which may also be thought to be a bug in their eyes).

Regards, Dave


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS] BUG #2374: Installation Error)
Next
From: "Adrian Maier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange results from to_timestamp