Re: A successor for PQgetssl - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: A successor for PQgetssl
Date
Msg-id 20060417162440.GH4474@ns.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A successor for PQgetssl  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: A successor for PQgetssl  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog@svana.org) wrote:
> Seriously, if people want to do really sophisticated things with the
> SSL library, they should setup s_tunnel instead. If we wanted to let

I certainly agree with all the rest but I'm just not sure I can agree
with you here.  While s_tunnel is nice it's not always an option and I
think it *would* be nice to have Postgres support things like CRLs and
OCSP but more from the server-side of things than the client-side.
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: A successor for PQgetssl
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR?