Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR?
Date
Msg-id 200604151555.k3FFt3722965@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I am thinking we should throw an error on pg_start_backup() and
> > pg_stop_backup if full_page_writes is off.
> 
> No, we'll just change the test in xlog.c so that fullPageWrites is
> ignored if XLogArchivingActive.

We should probably throw a LOG message too.

> > Seems archive_command and
> > full_page_writes can still be used if we are not in the process of doing
> > a file system backup.
> 
> Think harder: we are only safe if the first write to a given page after
> it's mis-copied by the archiver is a full page write.  The requirement
> therefore continues after pg_stop_backup.  Unless you want to add
> infrastructure to keep track for *every page* in the DB of whether it's
> been fully written since the last backup?

Ah, yea.

--  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR?
Next
From: Devrim GUNDUZ
Date:
Subject: Time for new releases?