On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:31:23PM +0300, Adrian Maier wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> I have included below a fragment of a discussion from the freepascal mailing
> list. Apparently, some folks expect to be able to start multiple transactions
> inside the *same* database connection. Since this is not possible in postgres,
> they would be forced to start more connections from the same application.
>
> Is such a feature possible to be implemented someday ?
It's not clear what the use case is. Given the original problem was
excised from the email it's not clear what they're trying to solve.
Transactions can "nest", sort of.
> My feeling is that this is a false problem, caused by some interbase/firebird
> or delphi habits . But ... the poster claims that Oracle and SqlServer
> have such a feature ( Oracle has 'named' transactions - but these
> names seem to be just labels ) - is this true ?
I beleive oracle can have independant subtransactions. That's something
different from several concurrent transaction though. I'm not oracle
expert though.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
