Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Date
Msg-id 20060401152114.GH49405@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 07:01:18PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> > Yes, but even the environment variables get me what I want. I  
> > therefore respectfully submit the attached patch to document them in  
> > the INSTALL file.
> 
> It seems rather pointless to document two instances of what is in fact
> a generic autoconf-script behavior ...

The problem is that PostgreSQL is moving out of the realm of "hard-core
geeks only" and more into the mainstream. I'd bet a number of our users
have very little idea how autoconf and it's progeny work. It's probably
not unlikely that those folks would be able to figure out where their
perl was, but then not know how to tell it to configure.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_class catalog question...
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?