Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Date
Msg-id 442EA09B.1000602@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:

>On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 07:01:18PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>  
>
>>David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> writes:
>>    
>>
>>>Yes, but even the environment variables get me what I want. I  
>>>therefore respectfully submit the attached patch to document them in  
>>>the INSTALL file.
>>>      
>>>
>>It seems rather pointless to document two instances of what is in fact
>>a generic autoconf-script behavior ...
>>    
>>
>
>The problem is that PostgreSQL is moving out of the realm of "hard-core
>geeks only" and more into the mainstream. I'd bet a number of our users
>have very little idea how autoconf and it's progeny work. It's probably
>not unlikely that those folks would be able to figure out where their
>perl was, but then not know how to tell it to configure.
>  
>

Most such users would use a binary distribution, though - either from 
the OS supplier or from our collection of binaries. If people are going 
to build postgres themselves from source then I *do* expect them to be 
moderately hard-core geeks.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: Remote PL/Java, Summary
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres dies when using an intarray operator