Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Why are we debating this? It won't get accepted anyway, because the
> > whole thing is silly. Show me one other object type that we issue
> > such warnings for, or anyone else who has even suggested that we should.
No other object type has the ability to require you to stop the server
and start a standalone backend to fix the mistake, which is what makes
this thing unique.
> So, I am very much confused. What do I do now. Do you mean the whole
> thing won't get accepted and I should stop developing the TODO item? or
> just strip the warning part.
Tom is referring to the WARNING.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
