Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention
Date
Msg-id 36e682920604211039h2d25a25h631023a93188803f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/21/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I've been looking into Gavin Hamill's recent report of poor performance
> with PG 8.1 on an 8-way IBM PPC64 box.

We have recently encountered some odd performance with 8.2dev on a
16-way Opteron.  In the next few days we'll look into it and see if it
may be related.

Otherwise, it sounds good to me; a trial of the new strategy should
definitely prove its value one way or the other.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1324


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item question [pg_hba.conf]
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request