Re: FOUND not set by EXECUTE? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: FOUND not set by EXECUTE?
Date
Msg-id 28688.1144532280@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to FOUND not set by EXECUTE?  (David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: FOUND not set by EXECUTE?  (David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> Note that FOUND is false, but the ROW_COUNT fetched by GET  
> DIAGNOSTICS is set to 1. So shouldn't FOUND be true? Or does it just  
> not work with EXECUTE and need to be documented as such? Or am I just  
> missing something obvious?

It *is* documented: the manual lists the statements that affect FOUND,
and EXECUTE is not among them.

Whether it should be is another question, but that's a definition
disagreement (a/k/a enhancement proposal) not a bug.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Summer of Code -- mentors needed as well
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor