On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, as long as we're annoying the freebsd-stable list with discussions of
> workarounds, I'm wondering whether our shared memory code might have similar
> risks. Does FBSD 6 also lie about the existence of other-jail processes
> connected to a shared memory segment --- ie, in shmctl(IPC_STAT)'s result,
> does shm_nattch count only processes in our own jail?
People are, of course, welcome to read the Jail documentation in order to read
the warning about not enabling the System V IPC support in Jails, and what the
possible results of doing so are.
Robert N M Watson
