Re: semaphore usage "port based"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: semaphore usage "port based"?
Date
Msg-id 20060403003619.L947@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: semaphore usage "port based"?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> No-one is taking a position of being "uninterested", so please don't
> be hasty to reciprocate.

I just posted it off the -hackers list, but there is an ancient patch in 
the FreeBSD queue for implementing Private IPCs for Jails ... not sure why 
it was never committed, or what is involved in bring it up to speed with 
the current 6.x and / or -current kernels though ... but, as I mentioned 
in another thread, I know that *at least* Apache2 makes use of shared 
memory for some of its stuff ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: semaphore usage "port based"?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Back, heading to Boston