Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
Subject Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
Date
Msg-id E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA579010E95E4@m0143.s-mxs.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Updatable views/with check option parsing  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > While I don't think that making WITH a fully reserved word would
cause
> > any great damage, I'm unwilling to do it just to save a couple of
lines
> > of code.
>
> I think we should go on and do promote WITH to a reserved keyword now

Oracle, MS-SQL, DB2, MySQL and Informix also have WITH reserved, so it
would
imho be ok to do it if it simplifies code.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James William Pye
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_proc probin misuse
Next
From: "ipig"
Date:
Subject: some question about deadlock