Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 January 2008

• 12:02   concurrency in psql kenneth d'souza
• 12:06   Index Page Split logging Simon Riggs
• 14:23   8.3RC1 release date Bruce Momjian
• 14:27   Re: concurrency in psql Sam Mason
• 15:02   Re: concurrency in psql Trevor Talbot
• 18:02   Re: Index Page Split logging Tom Lane
• 19:09   Implementing Sorting Refinements Manolo _
• 19:55   Re: Index Page Split logging Simon Riggs
• 20:09   Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Tom Lane
• 20:21   Re: Index Page Split logging Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:30   Re: Index Page Split logging Simon Riggs

2 January 2008

• 00:48   Re: binary array and record recv Andrew Chernow
• 08:24   Re: Index Page Split logging Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 09:05   Re: Index Page Split logging Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:34   Re: Index Page Split logging Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 09:40   Re: Index Page Split logging Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:16   Re: Index Page Split logging Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 11:54   Re: Index Page Split logging Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:16   Re: Index Page Split logging Simon Riggs
• 12:48   Re: Index Page Split logging Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 13:02   Re: Index Page Split logging Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:00   Autovacuum & Table List Ordering Usama Dar
• 14:29   Slow count(*) Abraham, Danny
• 14:50   Re: Slow count(*) Pavel Stehule
• 14:51   Re: Slow count(*) A. Kretschmer
• 14:53   Index performance Brian Modra
• 15:26   Re: Slow count(*) Andrew Sullivan
• 15:32   Re: Index performance Andrew Sullivan
• 16:55   Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 17:12   Re: Slow count(*) Simon Riggs
• 17:15   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Simon Riggs
• 17:40   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Andrew Dunstan
• 23:41   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Sam Mason

3 January 2008

• 04:26   Re: Index performance Brian Modra
• 06:04   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 06:15   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Tom Lane
• 06:38   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 07:11   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers David Fetter
• 09:24   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:32   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 09:55   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Albe Laurenz
• 12:40   ... Glyn Astill
• 13:35   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Alvaro Herrera
• 13:39   Re: Autovacuum & Table List Ordering Alvaro Herrera
• 14:06   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 14:16   Re: Slow count(*) Kevin Grittner
• 14:27   Re: Autovacuum & Table List Ordering Usama Dar
• 14:37   Re: Slow count(*) Brian Hurt
• 14:40   Re: Selectivity estimation for equality and range queries Peter Eisentraut
• 14:41   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Tom Lane
• 14:54   Re: Selectivity estimation for equality and range queries Tom Lane
• 14:57   Tuning Postgresql on Windows XP Pro 32 bit Doug Knight
• 14:58   Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers Andrew Dunstan
• 15:11   Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE printing logical and hardware I/O per-node Robert Lor
• 21:50   Please submit for OSCON! Josh Berkus
• 22:03   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Please submit for OSCON! Selena Deckelmann
• 22:04   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Please submit for OSCON! Joshua D. Drake

4 January 2008

• 03:16   timestamp typedefs Warren Turkal
• 03:41   Re: timestamp typedefs Tom Lane
• 03:54   Re: timestamp typedefs Tom Lane
• 04:27   Re: timestamp typedefs Warren Turkal
• 06:36   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 07:29   Re: Archiver behavior at shutdown Fujii Masao
• 08:58   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 09:22   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Richard Huxton
• 09:39   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 09:50   Problem with PgTcl auditing function on trigger Glyn Astill
• 10:00   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Richard Huxton
• 11:20   Re: timestamp typedefs Alvaro Herrera
• 11:30   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 11:39   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 11:49   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 12:23   Problem with PgTcl auditing function on trigger Glyn Astill
• 12:39   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 15:13   SSL over Unix-domain sockets Peter Eisentraut
• 15:36   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:18   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Bruce Momjian
• 16:38   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Peter Eisentraut
• 16:38   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Bruce Momjian
• 16:46   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Magnus Hagander
• 16:57   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Bruce Momjian
• 17:06   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Andrew Sullivan
• 17:11   Re: Index performance Andrew Sullivan
• 17:16   OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 17:29   Re: Problem with PgTcl auditing function on trigger Richard Huxton
• 17:37   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Aidan Van Dyk
• 18:10   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Tom Lane
• 18:37   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Bruce Momjian
• 18:38   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 19:08   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Andrew Sullivan
• 20:27   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 20:49   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Andrew Sullivan
• 21:01   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 21:07   Re: Problem with PgTcl auditing function on trigger Brett Schwarz
• 21:17   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 21:29   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane
• 21:40   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane
• 21:42   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 21:44   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 21:47   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane
• 21:51   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 22:29   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 22:45   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 23:01   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 23:46   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane

5 January 2008

• 02:09   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane
• 02:31   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Robert Treat
• 06:24   Re: timestamp typedefs Warren Turkal
• 08:33   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 09:16   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 10:37   [PATCH] pg_hba.conf.sample: mention www.postgresql.org Jari Aalto
• 11:09   Re: Archiver behavior at shutdown Simon Riggs
• 11:12   Away until Wed 9 Jan Simon Riggs
• 11:51   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps tomas@tuxteam.de
• 11:58   Re: [PATCH] pg_hba.conf.sample: mention www.postgresql.org Peter Eisentraut
• 12:13   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Peter Eisentraut
• 13:02   pg 8.3 Windows installer suggestion jMartinez
• 14:07   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 14:46   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 16:00   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Robert Treat
• 16:39   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Tom Lane
• 18:02   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 18:20   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Mark Mielke
• 18:47   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 20:05   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Peter Eisentraut
• 20:30   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Robert Treat
• 22:57   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane

6 January 2008

• 05:03   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps tomas@tuxteam.de
• 07:07   Re: [PATCH] pg_hba.conf.sample: mention www.postgresql.org Jari Aalto
• 07:15   Re: [PATCH] pg_hba.conf.sample: mention www.postgresql.org Tom Lane
• 07:17   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 07:24   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 07:37   Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Joshua D. Drake
• 08:50   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Joshua D. Drake
• 09:39   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 09:48   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 10:13   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 12:23   Re: Tuning Postgresql on Windows XP Pro 32 bit Usama Dar
• 13:26   Re: pg 8.3 Windows installer suggestion Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 14:10   beta4 accepts foreign key of different type than column Louis-David Mitterrand
• 14:18   Re: beta4 accepts foreign key of different type than column Andrew Dunstan
• 14:59   my bad (was: Re: beta4 accepts foreign key of different type than column Louis-David Mitterrand
• 15:07   Re: beta4 accepts foreign key of different type than column Gregory Stark
• 15:12   Re: beta4 accepts foreign key of different type than column Louis-David Mitterrand
• 16:26   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Robert Treat
• 18:32   Re: pg 8.3 Windows installer suggestion jMartinez
• 18:45   Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate Tom Lane

7 January 2008

• 00:20   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane
• 01:34   Random plan selection in DBT-3 ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 01:55   Re: Random plan selection in DBT-3 Tom Lane
• 02:06   Re: Random plan selection in DBT-3 ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 02:26   Re: Random plan selection in DBT-3 Tom Lane
• 05:00   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Joshua D. Drake
• 08:03   Re: Spoofing as the postmaster KaiGai Kohei
• 08:11   Re: Spoofing as the postmaster KaiGai Kohei
• 08:36   Re: Spoofing as the postmaster KaiGai Kohei
• 08:40   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Michael Akinde
• 10:20   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Csaba Nagy
• 11:18   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Alvaro Herrera
• 12:01   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 12:07   Re: Tuning Postgresql on Windows XP Pro 32 bit Doug Knight
• 12:13   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Csaba Nagy
• 12:32   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Csaba Nagy
• 12:42   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 13:50   Re: Tuning Postgresql on Windows XP Pro 32 bit Usama Dar
• 14:00   Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate Joe Conway
• 14:00   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Usama Dar
• 14:02   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 14:42   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Michael Akinde
• 14:46   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Andrew Sullivan
• 14:58   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Andrew Sullivan
• 15:07   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 15:21   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Gregory Stark
• 15:43   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Gregory Stark
• 15:51   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Joshua D. Drake
• 15:58   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Bruce Momjian
• 16:06   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Joshua D. Drake
• 16:20   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Holger Hoffstaette
• 16:24   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Joshua D. Drake
• 17:19   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 17:29   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Gregory Stark
• 17:37   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Gregory Stark
• 17:38   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Darcy Buskermolen
• 17:45   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Joshua D. Drake
• 18:09   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Andrew Sullivan
• 18:32   ERROR: translation failed from server encoding to wchar_t ilanco@gmail.com
• 18:43   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Tom Lane
• 19:25   Re: ERROR: translation failed from server encoding to wchar_t ilanco@gmail.com
• 19:35   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Tom Lane
• 19:53   Re: ERROR: translation failed from server encoding to wchar_t ilanco@gmail.com
• 19:53   Re: ERROR: translation failed from server encoding to wchar_t ilanco@gmail.com
• 20:22   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Ron Mayer
• 21:12   Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate Tom Lane
• 21:43   8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 22:22   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Andrew - Supernews
• 22:34   Re: Implementing Sorting Refinements Decibel!
• 23:05   Re: Implementing Sorting Refinements 
• 23:06   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Bruce Momjian
• 23:09   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 23:13   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Joshua D. Drake
• 23:17   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 23:25   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Darcy Buskermolen
• 23:25   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Tom Lane
• 23:33   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 23:48   Re: Implementing Sorting Refinements Guillaume Smet

8 January 2008

• 00:00   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Bruce Momjian
• 00:02   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Bruce Momjian
• 00:07   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Alvaro Herrera
• 00:57   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Tom Lane
• 01:12   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gregory Stark
• 01:15   Re: ERROR: translation failed from server encoding to wchar_t Tom Lane
• 01:21   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Joshua D. Drake
• 01:28   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Alvaro Herrera
• 03:31   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Mark Kirkwood
• 06:06   Re: Implementing Sorting Refinements Tomasz Ostrowski
• 07:36   Data from zone.tab Naz Gassiep
• 07:50   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Michael Akinde
• 08:02   Re: Data from zone.tab Naz Gassiep
• 08:05   Re: ERROR: translation failed from server encoding to wchar_t ilanco@gmail.com
• 08:46   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Magnus Hagander
• 08:47   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Peter Childs
• 08:47   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Magnus Hagander
• 08:59   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Magnus Hagander
• 11:31   Re: ERROR: translation failed from server encoding to wchar_t ilanco@gmail.com
• 11:53   Re: ERROR: translation failed from server encoding to wchar_t Andrew Dunstan
• 13:14   Psql command-line completion bug Gregory Stark
• 13:19   Re: Psql command-line completion bug Roberts, Jon
• 13:50   Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) Andrew Chernow
• 13:57   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Andrew Sullivan
• 14:40   Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) Markus Schiltknecht
• 15:08   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Tom Lane
• 15:23   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Tom Lane
• 15:27   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Michael Akinde
• 15:27   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Magnus Hagander
• 15:29   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Andrew Sullivan
• 15:38   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Andrew Sullivan
• 15:51   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Tom Lane
• 15:58   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Andrew Sullivan
• 16:10   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Magnus Hagander
• 16:28   Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) Andrew Chernow
• 16:33   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Cédric Villemain
• 16:33   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Tom Lane
• 16:51   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 16:53   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Sam Mason
• 16:57   Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) Andrew Dunstan
• 17:45   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Tom Lane
• 18:08   Named vs Unnamed Partitions Markus Schiltknecht
• 19:10   Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) Andrew Chernow
• 19:39   Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) Merlin Moncure
• 20:11   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane
• 20:21   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Alvaro Herrera
• 20:28   Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) Josh Berkus
• 20:32   Re: 8.3.0 release schedule (Was:Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate) Josh Berkus
• 20:44   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane
• 21:05   Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) Tom Lane
• 21:34   Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) Merlin Moncure
• 21:40   Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) Andrew Chernow
• 22:21   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane
• 22:47   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane

9 January 2008

• 01:03   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Gregory Stark
• 01:10   Problem with CVS HEAD's handling of mergejoins Tom Lane
• 01:21   Re: Problem with CVS HEAD's handling of mergejoins Bruce Momjian
• 01:26   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Gregory Stark
• 01:33   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane
• 02:18   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Alvaro Herrera
• 03:44   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Andrew Sullivan
• 04:28   Some notes about the index-functions security vulnerability Tom Lane
• 05:23   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gavin Sherry
• 07:11   Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:49   Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate Sokolov Yura
• 07:53   timestamp refactor effort Warren Turkal
• 07:56   Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate Sokolov Yura
• 09:14   Re: [PATCHES] Archiver behavior at shutdown Simon Riggs
• 09:34   operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Ilya A. Kovalenko
• 09:39   Some ideas about Vacuum Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 09:50   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Michael Akinde
• 11:21   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Markus Schiltknecht
• 11:56   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 12:25   LD_LIBRARY_PATH not honored on Debian unstable Markus Schiltknecht
• 12:52   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" A. Kretschmer
• 12:53   Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH not honored on Debian unstable Andrew Dunstan
• 13:11   Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH not honored on Debian unstable Markus Schiltknecht
• 13:34   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 13:47   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 13:49   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 13:49   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 13:53   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Markus Schiltknecht
• 13:57   Re: Some notes about the index-functions security vulnerability Simon Riggs
• 14:06   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 14:08   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Simon Riggs
• 14:08   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 14:11   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Gregory Stark
• 14:15   Re: [PATCHES] Archiver behavior at shutdown Tom Lane
• 14:18   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Tom Lane
• 14:21   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Markus Schiltknecht
• 14:31   Re: [PATCHES] Archiver behavior at shutdown Simon Riggs
• 14:56   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Gregory Stark
• 15:02   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Simon Riggs
• 15:26   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Simon Riggs
• 15:29   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Simon Riggs
• 15:31   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Markus Schiltknecht
• 15:40   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Markus Schiltknecht
• 15:48   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Gregory Stark
• 16:04   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Markus Schiltknecht
• 16:05   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Simon Riggs
• 16:13   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane
• 16:22   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Chris Browne
• 16:22   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Chris Browne
• 17:27   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Simon Riggs
• 17:57   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gavin Sherry
• 18:05   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Gregory Stark
• 18:17   Re: Problem with CVS HEAD's handling of mergejoins Tom Lane
• 18:22   tzdata issue on cross-compiled postgresql Tim Yardley
• 18:24   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Ron Mayer
• 18:55   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane
• 19:17   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 19:22   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Chris Browne
• 19:30   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Dimitri Fontaine
• 19:34   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 19:51   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Simon Riggs
• 20:05   Re: tzdata issue on cross-compiled postgresql Tom Lane
• 21:30   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gavin Sherry
• 21:42   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gavin Sherry
• 21:46   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Gavin Sherry
• 22:22   odd convert_from bug Andrew Dunstan
• 22:27   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Warren Turkal
• 22:30   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Joshua D. Drake
• 22:46   Re: odd convert_from bug Tom Lane
• 22:58   Re: odd convert_from bug Andrew Dunstan
• 23:53   Re: odd convert_from bug Andrew Dunstan

10 January 2008

• 00:18   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gavin Sherry
• 00:25   Re: tzdata issue on cross-compiled postgresql Tom Lane
• 00:31   Re: odd convert_from bug Tom Lane
• 01:00   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gavin Sherry
• 02:42   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Alvaro Herrera
• 03:33   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Brendan Jurd
• 04:16   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Warren Turkal
• 04:24   flex/bison output wrongly created in the source directory Warren Turkal
• 04:29   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Brendan Jurd
• 04:38   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Warren Turkal
• 04:51   Re: flex/bison output wrongly created in the source directory Tom Lane
• 05:00   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Tom Lane
• 05:05   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Dann Corbit
• 05:22   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Tom Lane
• 05:44   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Brendan Jurd
• 06:06   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Warren Turkal
• 06:06   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Tom Lane
• 06:19   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Warren Turkal
• 06:24   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 06:25   Re: operator suggest " interval / interval = numeric" Warren Turkal
• 06:30   Re: flex/bison output wrongly created in the source directory Warren Turkal
• 08:16   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 09:13   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Markus Schiltknecht
• 09:21   Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions Markus Schiltknecht
• 09:47   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 10:01   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Markus Schiltknecht
• 11:41   to_char incompatibility Peter Eisentraut
• 12:43   Re: to_char incompatibility Roberts, Jon
• 13:51   Re: to_char incompatibility Pavel Stehule
• 13:58   tag REL8_2_6 not present in file xyz Alvaro Herrera
• 14:36   Re: tag REL8_2_6 not present in file xyz Tom Lane
• 14:38   Re: to_char incompatibility Roberts, Jon
• 14:49   Re: flex/bison output wrongly created in the source directory Gregory Stark
• 15:04   Re: tag REL8_2_6 not present in file xyz Magnus Hagander
• 15:13   Re: flex/bison output wrongly created in the source directory Andrew Dunstan
• 15:50   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 16:52   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Ron Mayer
• 19:37   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gavin Sherry
• 19:42   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gavin Sherry
• 20:29   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 20:33   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 22:17   Pl/Java broken since Postgresql 8.3-rc1 Jan Ischebeck
• 23:01   Re: [GENERAL] 8.2.4 serious slowdown Tom Lane
• 23:24   Re: to_char incompatibility Josh Berkus

11 January 2008

• 00:18   Re: Pl/Java broken since Postgresql 8.3-rc1 Kris Jurka
• 00:22   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gavin Sherry
• 03:02   Re: to_char incompatibility Roberts, Jon
• 03:19   Re: Pl/Java broken since Postgresql 8.3-rc1 Kris Jurka
• 03:30   Re: to_char incompatibility Tom Lane
• 03:50   Re: Pl/Java broken since Postgresql 8.3-rc1 Tom Lane
• 04:18   Re: Pl/Java broken since Postgresql 8.3-rc1 Kris Jurka
• 07:06   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 07:48   Re: Pl/Java broken since Postgresql 8.3-rc1 Dave Page
• 08:19   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gavin Sherry
• 08:42   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 09:25   Storage Model for Partitioning Simon Riggs
• 09:59   Re: Storage Model for Partitioning Pavel Stehule
• 10:34   Re: Storage Model for Partitioning Richard Huxton
• 10:48   Re: Storage Model for Partitioning Csaba Nagy
• 10:51   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 10:57   Re: Storage Model for Partitioning Richard Huxton
• 11:04   Re: Storage Model for Partitioning Csaba Nagy
• 11:15   Re: Storage Model for Partitioning Simon Riggs
• 11:39   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 12:26   Re: Storage Model for Partitioning Richard Huxton
• 14:16   scan.l: check_escape_warning() Michael Meskes
• 14:32   could not open relation: Invalid argument Roberts, Jon
• 14:41   Re: scan.l: check_escape_warning() Tom Lane
• 15:14   Transaction Snapshot Cloning Simon Riggs
• 15:31   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 16:27   Re: scan.l: check_escape_warning() Andrew Dunstan
• 16:31   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 17:43   Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate Tom Lane
• 17:48   proposed libpq type system changes 0.9 Merlin Moncure
• 17:57   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Gavin Sherry
• 18:32   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps Simon Riggs
• 19:05   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Tom Lane
• 19:31   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 19:38   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Simon Riggs
• 19:42   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Simon Riggs
• 20:10   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 22:13   Declarative partitioning grammar Gavin Sherry
• 22:23   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Chris Browne
• 22:53   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Ron Mayer
• 23:04   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Mike
• 23:16   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Warren Turkal
• 23:23   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Tom Lane
• 23:40   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Jeff Cohen
• 23:46   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Merlin Moncure
• 23:53   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Gavin Sherry
• 23:57   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Tom Lane

12 January 2008

• 00:02   DECLARE CURSOR code question Neil Conway
• 00:07   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Jeff Cohen
• 00:53   Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps August Zajonc
• 01:02   Re: DECLARE CURSOR code question Tom Lane
• 01:59   A note about SIGTERM illusion and reality Tom Lane
• 03:12   Re: Psql command-line completion bug Tom Lane
• 08:32   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Simon Riggs
• 08:46   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Markus Schiltknecht
• 09:24   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar NikhilS
• 09:31   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar NikhilS
• 09:40   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar NikhilS
• 11:27   Postgresql Materialized views Jean-Michel Pouré
• 14:27   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Mark Mielke
• 15:57   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Tom Lane
• 16:34   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Peter Eisentraut
• 16:47   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Simon Riggs
• 16:54   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Markus Schiltknecht
• 17:29   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Dave Page
• 17:40   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Gavin Sherry
• 17:46   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Gregory Stark
• 17:50   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Mark Mielke
• 17:55   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Joshua D. Drake
• 17:59   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Mark Mielke
• 18:41   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Marko Kreen
• 19:11   getting out boolean value from PQgetValue function Arunachalam Parthasarathy
• 19:24   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Simon Riggs
• 19:28   Re: A note about SIGTERM illusion and reality Tom Lane
• 19:39   Re: getting out boolean value from PQgetValue function Tom Lane
• 19:42   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Tom Lane
• 20:08   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Simon Riggs
• 20:18   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Simon Riggs
• 20:22   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Tom Lane
• 21:32   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Mark Mielke
• 22:32   NOTICE messages during COPY OUT Tom Lane
• 23:03   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Jonah H. Harris
• 23:13   Unexpected log chatter during transaction abort in CVS HEAD Tom Lane
• 23:20   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Greg Smith

13 January 2008

• 00:23   Re: timestamp refactor effort Tom Lane
• 00:56   Make pg_dump suppress COMMENT ON SCHEMA public ? Tom Lane
• 03:44   ERROR during WAL replay Gurjeet Singh
• 07:13   Re: timestamp refactor effort Warren Turkal
• 07:22   Re: timestamp refactor effort Warren Turkal
• 10:18   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Jean-Michel Pouré
• 10:43   Re: scan.l: check_escape_warning() Michael Meskes
• 11:18   Re: Make pg_dump suppress COMMENT ON SCHEMA public ? Magnus Hagander
• 12:41   Re: Postgresql Materialized views James Mansion
• 15:41   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Mark Mielke
• 15:53   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Alvaro Herrera
• 16:05   Re: Make pg_dump suppress COMMENT ON SCHEMA public ? Kris Jurka
• 16:08   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Merlin Moncure
• 16:13   Re: Make pg_dump suppress COMMENT ON SCHEMA public ? Tom Lane
• 16:17   Re: Make pg_dump suppress COMMENT ON SCHEMA public ? Tom Lane
• 16:21   Re: timestamp refactor effort Tom Lane
• 16:31   Re: Make pg_dump suppress COMMENT ON SCHEMA public ? Magnus Hagander
• 16:57   Re: Make pg_dump suppress COMMENT ON SCHEMA public ? Tom Lane
• 17:09   Re: Make pg_dump suppress COMMENT ON SCHEMA public ? Magnus Hagander
• 17:53   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Hannes Dorbath
• 18:02   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Guillaume Smet
• 18:53   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Hannes Dorbath
• 18:53   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Hannes Dorbath
• 19:23   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Hannes Dorbath
• 19:36   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Sean Utt
• 19:54   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Joshua D. Drake
• 19:54   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane
• 19:59   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Webb Sprague
• 20:07   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Hannes Dorbath
• 20:59   Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity Tom Lane
• 21:14   Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity Guillaume Smet
• 21:23   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Hannes Dorbath
• 21:27   Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity Joshua D. Drake
• 21:39   Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity Guillaume Smet
• 21:41   Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity Joshua D. Drake
• 22:54   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane
• 23:01   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Tom Lane
• 23:15   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane
• 23:30   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Andrew Dunstan
• 23:31   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane
• 23:31   Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity Alvaro Herrera
• 23:42   Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity Guillaume Smet
• 23:52   Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity Tom Lane
• 23:57   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Joshua D. Drake

14 January 2008

• 00:10   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Andrew Dunstan
• 00:21   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Joshua D. Drake
• 00:31   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Andrew Dunstan
• 00:39   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Sean Utt
• 00:43   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane
• 00:46   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Andrew Dunstan
• 01:18   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Tom Lane
• 01:24   Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity Alvaro Herrera
• 01:36   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Mark Mielke
• 02:57   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Andrew Chernow
• 02:59   Re: Some notes about the index-functions security vulnerability Trevor Talbot
• 03:09   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Webb Sprague
• 03:23   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Joshua D. Drake
• 03:27   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Mark Mielke
• 03:52   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Joshua D. Drake
• 03:54   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Webb Sprague
• 08:21   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Simon Riggs
• 08:34   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Simon Riggs
• 08:52   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Markus Schiltknecht
• 08:57   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Jean-Michel Pouré
• 09:09   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Csaba Nagy
• 09:17   Using tapes on tuplesort.c 
• 09:53   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Hannes Dorbath
• 10:36   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Gregory Stark
• 12:12   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Mark Mielke
• 12:27   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Alvaro Herrera
• 12:29   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Roberts, Jon
• 13:09   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Mark Mielke
• 13:15   Re: Postgresql Materialized views tomas@tuxteam.de
• 13:20   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Alvaro Herrera
• 13:31   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Roberts, Jon
• 13:39   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Andrew Dunstan
• 13:48   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:50   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 14:34   Pl/Java broken since Postgresql 8.3-rc1 juergen_reif.nbg@t-online.de
• 14:36   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Tom Lane
• 15:03   Re: could not open relation: Invalid argument Alvaro Herrera
• 15:05   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Greg Sabino Mullane
• 15:39   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 15:53   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Joshua D. Drake
• 15:54   Re: Pl/Java broken since Postgresql 8.3-rc1 Josh Berkus
• 16:23   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Ron Mayer
• 17:23   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Hannes Dorbath
• 18:31   Re: scan.l: check_escape_warning() Tom Lane
• 18:34   Re: timestamp refactor effort Warren Turkal
• 20:08   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Most recent Postgres version is 8.2.6, per report from Robert Alvaro Herrera
• 20:19   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Most recent Postgres version is 8.2.6, per report from Robert Magnus Hagander
• 20:29   Re: to_char incompatibility Josh Berkus
• 20:29   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Jeff Davis
• 20:42   Re: to_char incompatibility Roberts, Jon
• 20:53   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane
• 21:14   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Bruce Momjian
• 21:16   Re: to_char incompatibility Josh Berkus
• 21:21   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Tom Lane
• 21:48   Re: to_char incompatibility Tom Lane
• 22:17   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Tom Lane
• 22:35   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Gavin Sherry
• 22:38   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Alvaro Herrera
• 22:48   Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid Tom Lane
• 23:18   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Tom Lane

15 January 2008

• 01:41   8.3RC1 on windows missing descriptive Event handle names Stephen Denne
• 01:51   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Gregory Stark
• 02:00   Re: to_char incompatibility Gregory Stark
• 02:11   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane
• 02:13   Re: could not open relation: Invalid argument Jaime Casanova
• 02:20   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Jeff Cohen
• 02:24   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Bruce Momjian
• 02:27   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Jeff Cohen
• 02:33   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Tom Lane
• 02:45   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Tom Lane
• 02:47   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Most recent Postgres version is 8.2.6, per report from Robert Bruce Momjian
• 02:52   Re: Pl/Java broken since Postgresql 8.3-rc1 Kris Jurka
• 03:14   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Bruce Momjian
• 03:31   Array behavior oddities Bruce Momjian
• 03:35   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Tom Lane
• 03:50   Re: Array behavior oddities Tom Lane
• 07:43   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Markus Schiltknecht
• 08:10   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Peter Eisentraut
• 08:25   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Magnus Hagander
• 08:26   Re: could not open relation: Invalid argument Magnus Hagander
• 11:06   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Alvaro Herrera
• 11:21   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Alvaro Herrera
• 12:18   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Hannu Krosing
• 12:33   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Kenneth Marshall
• 12:40   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Markus Schiltknecht
• 12:55   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Aidan Van Dyk
• 13:09   Re: Tuning Postgresql on Windows XP Pro 32 bit Doug Knight
• 13:16   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 13:24   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:26   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Markus Schiltknecht
• 13:55   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Bruce Momjian
• 14:04   Re: Array behavior oddities Bruce Momjian
• 14:36   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Tom Lane
• 14:46   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Tom Lane
• 14:49   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Markus Schiltknecht
• 14:55   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Alvaro Herrera
• 15:07   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Tom Lane
• 15:12   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Gregory Stark
• 15:14   Re: Array behavior oddities Gregory Stark
• 15:21   ts_headline() dumps core Yoshiyuki Asaba
• 15:28   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Gavin Sherry
• 15:34   Re: Array behavior oddities Tom Lane
• 15:38   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Tom Lane
• 15:39   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Markus Schiltknecht
• 15:45   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 15:53   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Markus Schiltknecht
• 15:55   Re: Tuning Postgresql on Windows XP Pro 32 bit Josh Berkus
• 15:56   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Markus Schiltknecht
• 15:59   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Kevin Grittner
• 16:02   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Markus Schiltknecht
• 16:12   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Gregory Stark
• 16:16   Re: ts_headline() dumps core Teodor Sigaev
• 16:27   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Jeff Davis
• 18:01   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Gregory Stark
• 18:24   Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 Tom Lane
• 19:15   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Greg Smith
• 20:38   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an ancient oversight in libpq's handling of V3-protocol COPY Tom Lane
• 20:41   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an ancient oversight in libpq's handling of V3-protocol COPY Tom Lane
• 20:45   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an ancient oversight in libpq's handling of V3-protocol COPY Tom Lane
• 20:48   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an ancient oversight in libpq's handling of V3-protocol COPY Tom Lane
• 21:00   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an ancient oversight in libpq's handling of V3-protocol COPY Simon Riggs
• 21:11   Password policy Roberts, Jon
• 22:29   Re: Password policy Andrew Dunstan
• 23:38   COPY encoding Andrew Dunstan
• 23:42   Re: could not open relation: Invalid argument Jaime Casanova
• 23:47   Re: COPY encoding Tom Lane

16 January 2008

• 02:18   WAL logging of hash indexes John Smith
• 02:53   Re: WAL logging of hash indexes Tom Lane
• 06:30   Re: Password policy D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 07:28   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 07:29   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 07:34   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 07:38   Re: WAL logging of hash indexes Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 09:23   Re: Array behavior oddities Jens-Wolfhard Schicke
• 09:28   Re: to_char incompatibility Peter Eisentraut
• 10:17   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:45   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:13   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 12:43   Re: Password policy Andrew Dunstan
• 13:14   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 13:16   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 13:17   Thick indexes - a look at count(1) query Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 14:10   Re: to_char incompatibility Tom Lane
• 14:14   Re: WAL logging of hash indexes Kenneth Marshall
• 14:39   Re: Password policy D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 15:07   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Florian G. Pflug
• 15:17   Re: Password policy Roberts, Jon
• 15:23   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Tom Lane
• 15:40   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 15:41   postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Mischa Sandberg
• 15:49   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Tom Lane
• 15:53   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Tom Lane
• 15:54   Re: to_char incompatibility Andrew Dunstan
• 16:10   Re: postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Tom Lane
• 16:13   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 16:13   Re: postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Mischa Sandberg
• 16:18   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Gregory Stark
• 16:32   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Guillaume Smet
• 16:33   Re: postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Tom Lane
• 16:40   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Greg Smith
• 16:50   Re: postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Stephen Frost
• 17:03   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Kevin Grittner
• 17:43   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:11   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 18:26   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Guillaume Smet
• 19:46   Re: COPY encoding Andrew Dunstan
• 19:51   Re: postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Tom Lane
• 19:53   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Alvaro Herrera
• 20:14   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Heikki Linnakangas
• 20:17   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Michael Omotayo Akinde
• 20:22   Re: Some ideas about Vacuum Greg Smith
• 20:22   Re: to_char incompatibility Bruce Momjian
• 20:50   Re: COPY encoding Tom Lane
• 21:09   Re: to_char incompatibility Bruce Momjian
• 21:15   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Simon Riggs
• 21:35   Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory Simon Riggs
• 22:21   Renaming a constraint's index Tom Lane
• 22:27   Re: Renaming a constraint's index Andrew Dunstan
• 23:08   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Andreas Pflug

17 January 2008

• 04:57   Re: postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Marc G. Fournier
• 05:13   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Tom Lane
• 05:18   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Marc G. Fournier
• 08:16   Re: to_char incompatibility Brendan Jurd
• 09:57   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Florian G. Pflug
• 10:31   Re: Postgresql Materialized views Florian G. Pflug
• 12:44   Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets Alvaro Herrera
• 12:48   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Alvaro Herrera
• 12:58   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Dave Page
• 13:37   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Stephen Frost
• 14:01   proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Pavel Stehule
• 14:55   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Josh Berkus
• 15:03   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Andrew Dunstan
• 15:06   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Joshua D. Drake
• 15:12   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Andrew Dunstan
• 15:18   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Simon Riggs
• 15:19   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Pavel Stehule
• 15:22   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Pavel Stehule
• 15:33   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Joshua D. Drake
• 15:33   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Joshua D. Drake
• 15:39   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Pavel Stehule
• 15:40   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Andrew Dunstan
• 15:44   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Pavel Stehule
• 15:44   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 15:49   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Joshua D. Drake
• 16:00   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Pavel Stehule
• 16:03   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Joshua D. Drake
• 16:11   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Merlin Moncure
• 16:44   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Bruce Momjian
• 16:55   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Joshua D. Drake
• 17:30   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Tom Lane
• 18:15   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Pavel Stehule
• 18:35   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 18:41   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Brendan Jurd
• 18:58   Re: Thick indexes - a look at count(1) query Decibel!
• 19:02   Re: Renaming a constraint's index Decibel!
• 19:10   Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE Josh Berkus
• 19:41   Re: Renaming a constraint's index Tom Lane
• 20:16   Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Joshua D. Drake
• 20:54   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Tom Lane
• 20:58   Re: Renaming a constraint's index Kevin Grittner
• 21:01   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Joshua D. Drake
• 21:13   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Tom Lane
• 21:20   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Marc G. Fournier
• 21:26   Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4 Kevin Grittner
• 21:26   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Joshua D. Drake
• 21:39   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Tom Lane
• 21:47   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Joshua D. Drake
• 21:52   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Mischa Sandberg
• 22:07   modularity of PostgreSQL Hope Ho
• 22:10   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Tom Lane
• 22:14   Re: modularity of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 22:46   Re: modularity of PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 22:49   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Tom Lane
• 22:52   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal Mischa Sandberg
• 22:57   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Tom Lane
• 23:32   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Alvaro Herrera
• 23:38   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Tom Lane
• 23:43   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Alvaro Herrera

18 January 2008

• 00:07   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Gregory Stark
• 00:34   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Tom Lane
• 02:11   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Joshua D. Drake
• 02:14   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Joshua D. Drake
• 06:36   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Gavin Sherry
• 07:23   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Magnus Hagander
• 08:17   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Dave Page
• 12:09   Re: modularity of PostgreSQL Jonah H. Harris
• 12:10   Re: modularity of PostgreSQL Jonah H. Harris
• 14:55   Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful Darcy Buskermolen
• 17:30   Problem with correct compiling and linking server side C function on Windows ,c++ Builder  Maciej Grygorcewicz
• 17:34   proposal: generic function, constructor function Pavel Stehule
• 18:09   Re: testing result overview (was: 8.3 beta testing suggestions welcome) Kevin Grittner
• 18:33   Recent pg_regress changes break testing under SELinux Tom Lane
• 20:00   Re: proposal: generic function, constructor function Tom Lane
• 20:34   Re: proposal: generic function, constructor function Pavel Stehule
• 20:40   Re: Recent pg_regress changes break testing under SELinux Alvaro Herrera
• 20:44   Re: proposal: generic function, constructor function Tom Lane
• 20:58   Re: Recent pg_regress changes break testing under SELinux Tom Lane
• 21:06   Re: proposal: generic function, constructor function Pavel Stehule
• 21:20   Re: Recent pg_regress changes break testing under SELinux Magnus Hagander
• 21:37   Re: Recent pg_regress changes break testing under SELinux Tom Lane
• 22:15   Re: Recent pg_regress changes break testing under SELinux Magnus Hagander
• 23:07   Traveling to London Bruce Momjian
• 23:24   Re: Recent pg_regress changes break testing under SELinux Tom Lane
• 23:28   Re: proposal: generic function, constructor function Tom Lane
• 23:51   Re: Traveling to London Gottfried F. Zojer

19 January 2008

• 00:36   Re: Traveling to London Josh Berkus
• 06:59   Re: proposal: generic function, constructor function Pavel Stehule
• 09:16   Re: proposal: generic function, constructor function Oleg Bartunov
• 10:16   Re: proposal: generic function, constructor function Pavel Stehule
• 11:34   SHM_HUGETLB on Linux 2.6. Kurt Roeckx
• 14:01   sun to buy mysql ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 14:06   Re: Recent pg_regress changes break testing under SELinux Magnus Hagander
• 14:22   Re: sun to buy mysql Jonah H. Harris
• 23:13   message string fixes Alvaro Herrera

20 January 2008

• 00:11   Re: [pgtranslation-translators] message string fixes Alvaro Herrera
• 00:12   [PATCH] Add size/acl information when listing databases Andrew Gilligan
• 01:07   Re: [PATCH] Add size/acl information when listing databases Tom Lane
• 01:11   Re: message string fixes Tom Lane
• 03:18   Re: [PATCH] Add size/acl information when listing databases Andrew Gilligan
• 03:34   Re: [PATCH] Add size/acl information when listing databases Tom Lane
• 05:00   Re: [PATCH] Add size/acl information when listing databases Andrew Gilligan
• 08:57   Re: message string fixes Teodor Sigaev
• 11:13   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Simon Riggs
• 11:15   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Simon Riggs
• 11:38   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:57   Re: Declarative partitioning grammar Simon Riggs
• 12:17   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Simon Riggs
• 14:11   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Gregory Stark
• 16:23   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Greg Sabino Mullane
• 16:47   select statement details Rick Vernam
• 17:06   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Alvaro Herrera
• 17:08   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:30   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Magnus Hagander
• 17:35   Re: message string fixes Tom Lane
• 17:50   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Tom Lane
• 17:53   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Joe Conway
• 18:36   Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning Simon Riggs
• 18:55   bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent Alvaro Herrera
• 19:08   Re: [DOCS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent Tom Lane
• 19:35   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 David Fetter
• 20:02   Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent Greg Smith
• 20:14   Minor bug in src/port/rint.c Mark Cave-Ayland
• 20:33   Re: message string fixes Teodor Sigaev
• 20:48   Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c Tom Lane
• 21:02   Re: message string fixes Tom Lane
• 21:06   Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c Magnus Hagander
• 21:16   Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent Tom Lane
• 21:18   Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c Tom Lane
• 21:19   Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c Magnus Hagander
• 21:24   Re: message string fixes Teodor Sigaev
• 21:26   Re: proposal: generic function, constructor function Pavel Stehule
• 21:34   Re: message string fixes Alvaro Herrera
• 21:52   Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c Mark Cave-Ayland
• 22:23   Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c Tom Lane
• 22:32   Re: message string fixes Tom Lane
• 23:48   Re: [GENERAL] setof record "out" syntax and returning records Alvaro Herrera

21 January 2008

• 00:54   Re: [GENERAL] setof record "out" syntax and returning records Tom Lane
• 01:58   Re: message string fixes Tom Lane
• 01:59   Re: message string fixes Tom Lane
• 02:14   Bug in psql/enum David Fetter
• 02:20   Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent Greg Smith
• 02:34   Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: Bug in psql/enum Tom Lane
• 03:06   Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? Tom Lane
• 03:50   Re: SHM_HUGETLB on Linux 2.6. Kohei KaiGai
• 05:36   mklink of pg_standby Hiroshi Saito
• 06:33   Re: mklink of pg_standby Simon Riggs
• 06:56   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Florian Weimer
• 07:08   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Marko Kreen
• 09:38   Re: Bug in psql/enum David Fetter
• 10:01   contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Pavel Stehule
• 10:12   Re: sun to buy mysql ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 12:00   Re: mklink of pg_standby Magnus Hagander
• 12:01   Re: mklink of pg_standby Magnus Hagander
• 12:11   Re: mklink of pg_standby Hiroshi Saito
• 12:13   Re: mklink of pg_standby Magnus Hagander
• 12:17   Re: mklink of pg_standby Hiroshi Saito
• 13:59   Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? Greg Sabino Mullane
• 14:05   Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? Andrew Dunstan
• 14:33   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Tom Lane
• 14:38   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Florian Weimer
• 14:59   Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? Gregory Stark
• 15:02   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Marko Kreen
• 15:17   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Marko Kreen
• 15:17   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Tom Lane
• 15:27   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Andrew Dunstan
• 15:33   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Tom Lane
• 15:45   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 15:58   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 16:04   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Gregory Stark
• 16:32   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Tom Lane
• 16:36   Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? Andrew Dunstan
• 16:41   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 17:09   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Tom Lane
• 17:30   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 17:30   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Alvaro Herrera
• 17:36   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Tom Lane
• 17:43   Polyphase Merge 
• 17:47   Re: [GENERAL] setof record "out" syntax and returning records Alvaro Herrera
• 19:35   benchmark farm andy
• 19:50   Re: Polyphase Merge Sam Mason
• 19:54   Re: [GENERAL] setof record "out" syntax and returning records Tom Lane
• 20:13   Re: Polyphase Merge Tom Lane
• 20:58   Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c Tom Lane
• 21:14   Re: [GENERAL] setof record "out" syntax and returning records Alvaro Herrera
• 21:31   Re: Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c Alvaro Herrera
• 22:01   Thoughts about bug #3883 Tom Lane
• 22:03   Re: [GENERAL] setof record "out" syntax and returning records Tom Lane
• 22:08   Re: Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c Tom Lane
• 22:33   Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? Larry Rosenman
• 22:50   Re: benchmark farm Andrew Dunstan
• 22:51   Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? Tom Lane
• 22:57   Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? Larry Rosenman
• 23:20   Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? Gregory Stark

22 January 2008

• 00:25   Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? Larry Rosenman
• 01:33   Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? Andrew Dunstan
• 01:40   Re: Makefile support for Mac OS X Fat Binaries? Tom Lane
• 01:43   find_typedef alternative that works on mainstream systems Alvaro Herrera
• 02:05   Re: find_typedef alternative that works on mainstream systems Alvaro Herrera
• 10:55   Errors with run_build.pl - 8.3RC2 cinu
• 11:34   Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce Peter Eisentraut
• 11:51   Re: Polyphase Merge Sam Mason
• 11:52   Re: Pl/Java broken since Postgresql 8.3-rc1 kids
• 12:25   Re: [LIKELY_SPAM]Thoughts about bug #3883 Roberts, Jon
• 13:41   Re: Errors with run_build.pl - 8.3RC2 Andrew Dunstan
• 14:42   Re: Thoughts about bug #3883 Alvaro Herrera
• 15:03   autonomous transactions Roberts, Jon
• 16:01   Re: Password policy Patrick McPhee
• 16:54   Re: Polyphase Merge 
• 17:52   Suboptimal plan choice problem with 8.3RC2 Guillaume Smet
• 17:53   Re: autonomous transactions Neil Conway
• 18:04   Re: autonomous transactions Alvaro Herrera
• 18:08   Re: autonomous transactions Roberts, Jon
• 18:28   Re: Suboptimal plan choice problem with 8.3RC2 Tom Lane
• 19:15   Re: Suboptimal plan choice problem with 8.3RC2 Guillaume Smet
• 19:17   Re: autonomous transactions Pavel Stehule
• 19:50   [PATCH] Add TimeOffset and DateOffset typedefs Warren Turkal
• 19:53   Re: Suboptimal plan choice problem with 8.3RC2 Alvaro Herrera
• 20:08   Fixed patch for timestamp refactor effort Warren Turkal
• 20:08   [PATCH] Add TimeOffset and DateOffset typedefs Warren Turkal
• 20:12   Re: [PATCH] Add TimeOffset and DateOffset typedefs Warren Turkal
• 20:48   Re: Suboptimal plan choice problem with 8.3RC2 Guillaume Smet
• 21:22   Re: Suboptimal plan choice problem with 8.3RC2 Alvaro Herrera
• 21:37   Re: Suboptimal plan choice problem with 8.3RC2 Guillaume Smet

23 January 2008

• 07:14   Re: autonomous transactions Simon Riggs
• 07:27   Re: autonomous transactions Neil Conway
• 08:06   Re: autonomous transactions Pavel Stehule
• 08:31   Re: autonomous transactions Gregory Stark
• 09:26   Re: [GENERAL] Errors with run_build.pl - 8.3RC2 Michael Meskes
• 13:34   Re: Suboptimal plan choice problem with 8.3RC2 Guillaume Smet
• 14:44   Re: Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c Alvaro Herrera
• 15:33   Re: Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c Alvaro Herrera
• 15:41   Re: Thick indexes - a look at count(1) query Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 16:02   Re: Thick indexes - a look at count(1) query Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:39   Re: Thick indexes - a look at count(1) query Guillaume Smet
• 20:06   Re: autonomous transactions Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 21:24   Re: autonomous transactions Alvaro Herrera
• 21:39   Re: autonomous transactions Simon Riggs
• 22:04   Re: autonomous transactions Neil Conway
• 22:32   Re: autonomous transactions Tom Lane

24 January 2008

• 02:12   Re: autonomous transactions Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 02:35   Re: autonomous transactions Jonah H. Harris
• 22:34   Re: autonomous transactions Robert Treat

25 January 2008

• 09:50   plperl: Documentation on BYTEA decoding is wrong Florian Weimer
• 10:39   Truncate Triggers Simon Riggs
• 11:01   Default index tablespace Peter Eisentraut
• 11:44   Re: Default index tablespace Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 12:52   Re: Default index tablespace Simon Riggs
• 13:18   Re: Default index tablespace Zdenek Kotala
• 14:11   Re: plperl: Documentation on BYTEA decoding is wrong Andrew Dunstan
• 14:44   Re: Truncate Triggers Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: Default index tablespace Tom Lane
• 15:57   Proposal: Integrity check Zdenek Kotala
• 16:27   Re: Proposal: Integrity check Tom Lane
• 17:03   Re: Proposal: Integrity check Zdenek Kotala
• 17:49   Re: Truncate Triggers Simon Riggs
• 17:50   Re: Thoughts about bug #3883 Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: Proposal: Integrity check Tom Lane
• 18:00   Re: Truncate Triggers Tom Lane
• 18:05   Re: Truncate Triggers Stephen Frost
• 18:43   Re: Truncate Triggers Simon Riggs
• 19:02   Re: Proposal: Integrity check Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 19:24   Re: Proposal: Integrity check Tom Lane
• 19:52   Re: Thoughts about bug #3883 Gregory Stark
• 19:58   Re: Proposal: Integrity check Gregory Stark
• 20:15   Re: Truncate Triggers Gregory Stark
• 20:16   Re: Thoughts about bug #3883 Tom Lane
• 21:13   Re: Proposal: Integrity check Simon Riggs
• 22:22   we have out func for typecast, but we missing this read function Pavel Stehule
• 22:37   Re: we have out func for typecast, but we missing this read function Tom Lane
• 23:03   PostgreSQL Programmer's Guide Books Gevik Babakhani
• 23:16   Re: we have out func for typecast, but we missing this read function Pavel Stehule
• 23:31   Re: Truncate Triggers Brendan Jurd

26 January 2008

• 00:23   Re: Truncate Triggers Stephen Frost
• 13:51   WIP: variadic function, named params Pavel Stehule
• 14:29   Re: PostgreSQL Programmer's Guide Books Robert Treat
• 14:31   Re: PostgreSQL Programmer's Guide Books Gevik Babakhani
• 15:19   Re: Truncate Triggers Robert Treat
• 15:34   Re: Truncate Triggers Gregory Stark
• 15:56   Re: Truncate Triggers Andreas Pflug
• 15:57   Re: Truncate Triggers Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:07   Re: plperl: Documentation on BYTEA decoding is wrong Robert Treat
• 16:35   Simple row serialization? Ivan Voras
• 16:49   Re: Simple row serialization? Pavel Stehule
• 17:01   Re: Simple row serialization? Andrew Dunstan
• 17:03   Re: Simple row serialization? Ivan Voras
• 17:13   Re: Truncate Triggers Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: Truncate Triggers Tom Lane
• 17:32   Re: Simple row serialization? Ivan Voras
• 17:40   Re: Simple row serialization? Tom Lane
• 17:46   Re: Simple row serialization? Pavel Stehule
• 18:12   Re: Truncate Triggers Stephen Frost
• 18:13   Re: Simple row serialization? Tom Lane
• 18:16   Re: Truncate Triggers Tom Lane
• 18:21   Re: Truncate Triggers Simon Riggs
• 18:41   Re: Simple row serialization? Ivan Voras
• 18:43   Re: Simple row serialization? Oleg Bartunov
• 20:00   Re: Truncate Triggers Stephen Frost

27 January 2008

• 05:11   Re: Simple row serialization? tomas@tuxteam.de
• 11:08   Re: Simple row serialization? Ivan Voras
• 14:02   CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Gregory Stark
• 16:39   Re: Simple row serialization? Andrew Dunstan
• 16:45   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Tom Lane
• 17:09   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Guillaume Smet
• 17:14   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Tom Lane
• 17:23   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Guillaume Smet
• 17:37   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Tom Lane
• 18:15   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Guillaume Smet
• 18:54   MSVC Build error Gevik Babakhani
• 19:07   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Markus Bertheau
• 19:11   what is suffix _P in gram.y Pavel Stehule
• 19:11   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Guillaume Smet
• 19:27   Re: what is suffix _P in gram.y Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:33   Re: what is suffix _P in gram.y Tom Lane
• 19:47   Re: what is suffix _P in gram.y Pavel Stehule
• 19:59   Re: MSVC Build error Magnus Hagander
• 20:04   Re: MSVC Build error Gevik Babakhani
• 23:02   GSSAPI doesn't play nice with non-canonical host names Tom Lane

28 January 2008

• 00:09   SSL connections don't cope with server crash very well at all Tom Lane
• 01:04   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Tom Lane
• 01:33   Re: GSSAPI doesn't play nice with non-canonical host names Stephen Frost
• 01:51   Re: GSSAPI doesn't play nice with non-canonical host names Tom Lane
• 02:17   pl/pgsql Plan Invalidation and search_path Stephen Frost
• 02:45   Re: pl/pgsql Plan Invalidation and search_path Tom Lane
• 03:11   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Michael Glaesemann
• 03:11   Re: pl/pgsql Plan Invalidation and search_path Merlin Moncure
• 03:22   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Tom Lane
• 03:27   Re: pl/pgsql Plan Invalidation and search_path Tom Lane
• 04:36   Vacuum threshold and non-serializable read-only transaction ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 04:49   Re: Vacuum threshold and non-serializable read-only transaction Tom Lane
• 05:11   RFC: array_agg() per SQL:200n Neil Conway
• 05:48   Re: Vacuum threshold and non-serializable read-only transaction ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 06:18   Slow Query problem Premsun Choltanwanich
• 07:28   Re: GSSAPI doesn't play nice with non-canonical host names Magnus Hagander
• 07:56   Re: SSL connections don't cope with server crash very well at all Magnus Hagander
• 08:57   Re: RFC: array_agg() per SQL:200n Gregory Stark
• 09:37   Re: plperl: Documentation on BYTEA decoding is wrong Florian Weimer
• 10:25   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 11:16   Re: Proposal: Integrity check Zdenek Kotala
• 12:25   Re: GSSAPI doesn't play nice with non-canonical host names Magnus Hagander
• 12:51   Re: [PATCHES] Including Snapshot Info with Indexes Jonah H. Harris
• 13:25   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Florian G. Pflug
• 13:33   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Guillaume Smet
• 13:56   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Kevin Grittner
• 14:00   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Andrew Dunstan
• 14:23   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Kevin Grittner
• 15:13   system catalog constraints question Gevik Babakhani
• 15:47   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Tom Lane
• 15:48   Re: system catalog constraints question Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:48   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Tom Lane
• 15:50   Re: GSSAPI doesn't play nice with non-canonical host names Tom Lane
• 15:50   Re: system catalog constraints question Gevik Babakhani
• 15:56   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Steve Atkins
• 16:08   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Kevin Grittner
• 16:14   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Simon Riggs
• 16:47   Re: [PATCH] Add size/acl information when listing databases Bruce Momjian
• 17:56   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Bruce Momjian
• 18:05   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 18:13   Re: [PATCHES] Friendly help for psql Bruce Momjian
• 18:26   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Florian G. Pflug
• 18:52   Re: Truncate Triggers Decibel!
• 18:53   Re: There's random access and then there's random access Decibel!
• 18:53   Re: Spoofing as the postmaster Decibel!
• 18:53   Re: Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c Decibel!
• 18:53   Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target Decibel!
• 18:54   Re: autonomous transactions Decibel!
• 18:54   Re: [PATCHES] Friendly help for psql Greg Sabino Mullane
• 19:03   Mail issue Decibel!
• 19:14   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Greg Sabino Mullane
• 19:21   Re: [PATCHES] Friendly help for psql Tom Lane
• 19:29   Re: Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c Tom Lane
• 20:21   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Tom Lane
• 20:33   Re: autonomous transactions Roberts, Jon
• 21:15   Re: RFC: array_agg() per SQL:200n Jeff Davis
• 21:36   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Jeff Davis
• 21:38   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Jeff Davis
• 21:39   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Simon Riggs
• 21:45   Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Jeff Davis
• 22:13   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Heikki Linnakangas
• 22:14   Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target Christopher Browne
• 22:41   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Jeff Davis
• 22:51   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Simon Riggs
• 22:59   Re: Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c Alvaro Herrera
• 23:10   Re: Truncate Triggers Alvaro Herrera
• 23:13   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Ron Mayer

29 January 2008

• 00:42   Re: find_typedef alternative that works on mainstream systems Bruce Momjian
• 00:59   Re: RFC: array_agg() per SQL:200n Joe Conway
• 01:11   Bogus cleanup code in GSSAPI/SSPI patch Tom Lane
• 01:39   Re: RFC: array_agg() per SQL:200n Hitoshi Harada
• 02:12   Transition functions for SUM(::int2), SUM(::int4, SUM(::int8]) Caleb Welton
• 02:33   Re: Transition functions for SUM(::int2), SUM(::int4, SUM(::int8]) Tom Lane
• 06:52   Re: autonomous transactions Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 07:06   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Marko Kreen
• 07:11   Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 Florian Weimer
• 07:21   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanningGUCvariable Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:34   GSSAPI and V2 protocol Kris Jurka
• 08:28   How to use VB6 for store image to postgresql? Premsun Choltanwanich
• 08:40   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 09:56   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Gregory Stark
• 10:28   Re: How to use VB6 for store image to postgresql? Gevik Babakhani
• 11:15   Re: Bogus cleanup code in GSSAPI/SSPI patch Magnus Hagander
• 11:16   Re: RFC: array_agg() per SQL:200n Peter Eisentraut
• 12:34   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 12:41   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Kenneth Marshall
• 14:10   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Tom Lane
• 14:37   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 15:12   Re: autonomous transactions Bruce Momjian
• 15:15   Re: autonomous transactions Bruce Momjian
• 15:39   Large pgstat.stat file causes I/O storm Cristian Gafton
• 15:43   Re: Large pgstat.stat file causes I/O storm Cristian Gafton
• 16:48   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Jeff Davis
• 17:41   Re: Large pgstat.stat file causes I/O storm Tom Lane
• 18:09   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: Large pgstat.stat file causes I/O storm Cristian Gafton
• 18:28   Re: Large pgstat.stat file causes I/O storm Tom Lane
• 18:45   Re: Large pgstat.stat file causes I/O storm Cristian Gafton
• 19:12   Re: Large pgstat.stat file causes I/O storm Tom Lane
• 19:57   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Kevin Grittner
• 20:40   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Tom Lane
• 20:45   Re: Transition functions for SUM(::int2), SUM(::int4, SUM(::int8]) Tom Lane
• 20:46   Re: Large pgstat.stat file causes I/O storm Cristian Gafton
• 21:21   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Ron Mayer
• 21:22   Re: Transition functions for SUM(::int2), SUM(::int4, SUM(::int8]) Caleb Welton
• 21:22   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Tom Lane
• 21:37   Re: Large pgstat.stat file causes I/O storm Tom Lane
• 21:51   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanningGUCvariable Stephen Denne
• 22:04   Win32: Building with Longhorn SDK Neil Conway
• 23:41   Opinions about wording of error messages for bug #3883? Tom Lane
• 23:59   Re: Opinions about wording of error messages for bug #3883? Alvaro Herrera

30 January 2008

• 01:18   Re: Opinions about wording of error messages for bug #3883? Tom Lane
• 01:36   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Guillaume Smet
• 01:59   Re: 8.3RC1 on windows missing descriptive Event handle names Stephen Denne
• 02:20   Possible future performance improvement: sort updates/deletes by ctid Tom Lane
• 02:25   Re: [pgtranslation-translators] Opinions about wording of error messages for bug #3883? Alvaro Herrera
• 03:05   Re: Possible future performance improvement: sort updates/deletes by ctid Stephen Denne
• 03:44   Re: Possible future performance improvement: sort updates/deletes by ctid Tom Lane
• 03:54   Re: Possible future performance improvement: sort updates/deletes by ctid Stephen Denne
• 05:13   Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA? Dann Corbit
• 08:30   Re: [pgtranslation-translators] Opinions about wording of error messages for bug #3883? Guillaume Lelarge
• 08:38   Re: MSVC Build error Magnus Hagander
• 08:51   Re: Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA? Simon Riggs
• 08:57   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 12:25   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Kenneth Marshall
• 15:01   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Alvaro Herrera
• 15:36   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Simon Riggs
• 16:02   Re: Truncate Triggers Simon Riggs
• 16:05   Re: autonomous transactions Josh Berkus
• 16:12   Re: autonomous transactions Alvaro Herrera
• 16:19   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Tom Lane
• 16:22   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Tom Lane
• 16:41   Re: Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA? Tom Lane
• 16:56   Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA? Christopher Browne
• 17:08   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Tom Lane
• 17:15   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Simon Riggs
• 17:42   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:24   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Simon Riggs
• 19:28   Re: Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA? Gregory Stark
• 19:29   Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Dave Page
• 19:55   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:56   Re: Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA? Dann Corbit
• 19:58   Re: 8.3RC1 on windows missing descriptive Event handle names Magnus Hagander
• 20:12   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Magnus Hagander
• 20:17   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Dave Page
• 20:20   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Magnus Hagander
• 20:22   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Andrew Dunstan
• 20:25   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Dave Page
• 21:09   Re: Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA? Simon Riggs
• 21:27   Re: GSSAPI doesn't play nice with non-canonical host names Tom Lane
• 21:59   Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target Decibel!
• 22:09   Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target Gregory Stark
• 22:36   Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target Guillaume Smet
• 22:51   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Tom Lane
• 23:20   Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target Tom Lane

31 January 2008

• 00:14   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Tom Lane
• 00:22   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Tom Lane
• 00:33   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Andrew Dunstan
• 00:33   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Bruce Momjian
• 00:38   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Bruce Momjian
• 00:41   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Tom Lane
• 01:13   Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target Christopher Browne
• 01:16   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Bruce Momjian
• 02:18   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Andrew Dunstan
• 04:49   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Tom Lane
• 05:13   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Tom Lane
• 06:12   Re: Truncate Triggers Decibel!
• 06:28   Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target Decibel!
• 07:08   Re: Truncate Triggers Simon Riggs
• 07:18   BUG: type of "xxxx" does not match that when preparing the plan Hubert FONGARNAND
• 07:28   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Dave Page
• 07:40   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Magnus Hagander
• 07:43   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Magnus Hagander
• 08:25   Re: 8.3RC1 on windows missing descriptive Event handle names Magnus Hagander
• 08:50   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Andrew Dunstan
• 09:23   Re: Truncate Triggers Gregory Stark
• 09:42   Re: Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA? Hannu Krosing
• 09:42   Re: Truncate Triggers Hannu Krosing
• 10:45   Re: Truncate Triggers Simon Riggs
• 11:32   Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target Alvaro Herrera
• 12:36   Re: Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:42   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Bruce Momjian
• 13:21   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Alvaro Herrera
• 13:33   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Simon Riggs
• 13:45   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Tom Lane
• 13:47   Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable) Alvaro Herrera
• 13:48   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target Kevin Grittner
• 14:07   Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Dimitri Fontaine
• 14:16   Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable) Peter Eisentraut
• 14:16   Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Bruce Momjian
• 14:17   Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable) Bruce Momjian
• 14:26   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Andrew Dunstan
• 14:29   Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Andrew Dunstan
• 14:32   Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable) Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: BUG: type of "xxxx" does not match that when preparing the plan Tom Lane
• 14:36   timestamp format bug Roberts, Jon
• 14:48   Re: timestamp format bug Kevin Grittner
• 14:59   Re: BUG: type of "xxxx" does not match that when preparing the plan Hubert FONGARNAND
• 15:01   Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Dimitri Fontaine
• 15:02   Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable) Bruce Momjian
• 15:07   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Tom Lane
• 15:09   Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable Gregory Stark
• 15:18   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 15:28   Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died Andrew Dunstan
• 15:48   Re: timestamp format bug Tom Lane
• 15:56   Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:28   Re: timestamp format bug Roberts, Jon
• 17:33   Re: timestamp format bug Kevin Grittner
• 17:36   Re: timestamp format bug Roberts, Jon
• 17:46   Re: timestamp format bug Kevin Grittner
• 17:47   Re: timestamp format bug Roberts, Jon
• 18:47   Re: timestamp format bug Kevin Grittner
• 19:00   Re: timestamp format bug Kevin Grittner