Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
Date
Msg-id 4794D82B.3070904@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>>> I read that Perl 5.10 is about to hit Fedora rawhide.  Anyone know if
>>> it will work with plperl and/or DBD::Pg?  If there are fixes needed
>>> in plperl, it'd sure be nice if they were in 8.3 ...
>>>     
>>
>> I've tested 5.10 against both and they seem to work fine. My plperl 
>> tests
>> are not necessarily thorough, but it compiled smoothly and ran a 
>> bunch of
>> plperlu code without a problem. DBD::Pg worked fine, all its tests 
>> passed.
>>
>>
>>   
>
> For plperl, we need to test at least:
>
>    * standard plperl regression tests
>    * the UTF8 problem we recently fixed
>
>

First news is not good. On my test we have failed one of the regression 
tests - the "use strict" processing seems to be backwards. I will try to 
get to the bottom of it.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce
Next
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce