Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
Date
Msg-id 4794B4A0.6000509@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
Responses Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>> I read that Perl 5.10 is about to hit Fedora rawhide.  Anyone know if
>> it will work with plperl and/or DBD::Pg?  If there are fixes needed
>> in plperl, it'd sure be nice if they were in 8.3 ...
>>     
>
> I've tested 5.10 against both and they seem to work fine. My plperl tests
> are not necessarily thorough, but it compiled smoothly and ran a bunch of
> plperlu code without a problem. DBD::Pg worked fine, all its tests passed.
>
>
>   

For plperl, we need to test at least:
   * standard plperl regression tests   * the UTF8 problem we recently fixed

I can check this out later today.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3