Re: Opinions about wording of error messages for bug #3883? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Opinions about wording of error messages for bug #3883?
Date
Msg-id 20080130005623.GK27546@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Opinions about wording of error messages for bug #3883?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Opinions about wording of error messages for bug #3883?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> I would like to export this routine and have it be used by all four
> commands, instead of duplicating this logic everywhere.  However,
> that brings up the question of whether the error messages are
> generic enough for all four commands; and if not, how we want them
> to read.  I'm tempted to rephrase both messages along the line of
> 
>     cannot %s \"%s\" because ...
>
> where the first %s is replaced by a SQL command name, viz ALTER TABLE,
> CLUSTER, etc.  I'm not sure how nice this is for translation though.

I suggestcannot execute \"%s\" on \"%s\" because ...

> Also, with 8.3 release being so close, it's likely that any change would
> not get reflected into translations before release.  I don't think
> that's a showstopper because these messages should hardly ever be seen
> by normal users anyway; but maybe it's a consideration.

I wouldn't worry about that at this point.  We didn't declare a string
freeze anyway ...

It will likely be fixed in 8.3.1 for translations where it matters
anyway, if the translator is not able to do it for 8.3.  (That's
currently only fr, de and es -- currently even tr is a bit behind).

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Opinions about wording of error messages for bug #3883?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Opinions about wording of error messages for bug #3883?