Re: Index Page Split logging - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gokulakannan Somasundaram
Subject Re: Index Page Split logging
Date
Msg-id 9362e74e0801020119i6483c3b1x1a28cea5628490d5@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Index Page Split logging  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Index Page Split logging  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Jan 2, 2008 2:25 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 14:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > If we could log *only* the insert that caused the split, rather than the
> > split itself, we would avoid that situation entirely.
>
> How are you going to avoid the need to run user-defined functions
> (specifically, the btree comparison functions) during replay?

Seems like a good objection. Just exercising my lateral thought muscles.

Can this be explained in more detail???

Thanks,
Gokul.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: binary array and record recv
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Index Page Split logging