Re: modularity of PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: modularity of PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 36e682920801180509o42693d07ga4137e519a737002@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: modularity of PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: modularity of PostgreSQL
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 17, 2008 6:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Uh, does anyone authoritative describe it that way?  I think we can
> legitimately claim that Postgres is pretty extensible, but as for
> modularity I'm not sure that it's got any great claim to fame.
> To me modularity connotes an emphasis on dividing the system into
> pieces separated by carefully-defined, small-footprint interfaces,
> and we have not done spectacularly well on that score.

Agreed.  Postges is extensible, not modular.


-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation                | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor          | jonah.harris@enterprisedb.com
Edison, NJ 08837                        | http://www.enterprisedb.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: modularity of PostgreSQL