Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4
Date
Msg-id 11187.1200270668@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote;
> Hannes Dorbath <light@theendofthetunnel.de> writes:
>> I have the bad feeling that I need to correct this into "It happens when 
>> autovacuum is active on the table".

> Ah-hah, I realize how to explain that too, now.

Hmm, no, scratch that: neither VACUUM nor ANALYZE use a standard
heapscan, so they won't move the syncscan pointer.  Were you performing
some other query that did a partial seqscan of the table?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql Materialized views
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity