Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent
Date
Msg-id 19882.1200886188@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the main problem is the qualifying clause up front in a place
>> of prominence.  Here's a V3 try

> That one looks good to me.  These are small details but better to get it
> right now.

OK, committed.  Back to Alvaro's original concern: is the short
description in guc.c all right, or can we improve that?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent
Next
From: "Erik"
Date:
Subject: PgAdmin instead of PgAccess