Re: Truncate Triggers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Truncate Triggers
Date
Msg-id 1201779955.4453.259.camel@ebony.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Truncate Triggers  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Truncate Triggers  (Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:22 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Decibel!" <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> 
> > CLUSTER isn't DDL. Most forms of ALTER TABLE are. And CREATE blah, etc.
> 
> Fwiw I would call CLUSTER DDL. Note that it does make a change that's visible
> in the table definition afterwards.
> 
> There are plenty of DDL commands which modify data (CREATE INDEX, ATLER TABLE
> ALTER COLUMN TYPE). The defining characteristic of DDL is not that it doesn't
> modify the data but that it does modify the table definition.
> 
> By that definition CLUSTER is DDL and TRUNCATE is DDL if you look at the
> implementation rather than the user-visible effects.

Surely the question is more simple: do we want triggers on it?

There's a clear case for TRUNCATE to have a triggers.

Is there a clear case for any other statements (however you categorise
them)? If so, lets hear it, please.

--  Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Truncate Triggers
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target