Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE
Date
Msg-id 162867790801171115g430f5035x562b698fc7327eb7@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> If primary goal is ANSI SQL conformance shouldn't we be focusing on
> pl/psm not plpgsql? (yes I am aware they are similar syntatically)

I am not sure if in 8.4 will be space for changes in PL interprets. I
expect so plpgsql will be main SQL language next two years. I don't
plan any big changes  - some cases like this is different (it's 2days
work).

Pavel


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4