Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gokulakannan Somasundaram
Subject Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Date
Msg-id 9362e74e0801051142p50210q4f4073e38b57f98f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps  (tomas@tuxteam.de)
Responses Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
List pgsql-hackers


On Jan 5, 2008 6:15 PM, <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote:

One thought I had back then, with partitioned tables was "gee -- B-tree
index is already doing a partition; why do a manual partition on top of
that?".

Can you please explain more on what you are trying to say here?


Thanks,
Gokul.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Mielke
Date:
Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets