On Jan 27, 2008, at 21:04 , Tom Lane wrote:
> [ redirecting thread to -hackers ]
>
> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
>> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 21:54 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
>>> I liked the "synchronized_sequential_scans" idea myself.
>
>> I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or
>> "synchronized_seqscans"?
>
> We have enable_seqscan already, so that last choice seems to fit in.
Would it make sense to match the plural as well?
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
