Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Date
Msg-id 17505.1201494143@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> writes:
>> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
>>> I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or
>>> "synchronized_seqscans"?

> Would it make sense to match the plural as well?

Actually, the best suggestion I've seen so far is Guillaume's
"synchronize_seqscans" --- make it a verb phrase.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql Plan Invalidation and search_path
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql Plan Invalidation and search_path