Re: WAL logging of hash indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gokulakannan Somasundaram
Subject Re: WAL logging of hash indexes
Date
Msg-id 9362e74e0801160038j4bbec4c8s24ae84a672f76b54@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL logging of hash indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt
0pt0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">There is absolutely 0 value in tackling that until someone can fix<br /> hash's
performanceproblems.  If there is no real-world scenario for<br />using it ... which there really isn't ... then adding
WALsupport<br />still leaves you with no real-world scenario for using it.<br /><br />This is not to suggest that I
wouldn'tlike to see all of that fixed; <br />I would.  But let's concentrate on the showstoppers first, rather than<br
/>expendingeffort that might ultimately be a waste.<br /><br /><br /></blockquote></div>I agree on that. I think
workingon Hash clusters would add more use-cases than working on hash-indexes. <br /><br />Thanks,<br />Gokul.  <br /> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gokulakannan Somasundaram"
Date:
Subject: Re: Some ideas about Vacuum
Next
From: Jens-Wolfhard Schicke
Date:
Subject: Re: Array behavior oddities